O20.6 Chlamydia trachomatis viable load at six different anatomical sample sites in women (CHLAMOUR)

K. Janssen, M. Lucchesi, C. Weijzen, N. Dukers-Muijrers, P. Wolffs, C. Hoebe
{"title":"O20.6 Chlamydia trachomatis viable load at six different anatomical sample sites in women (CHLAMOUR)","authors":"K. Janssen, M. Lucchesi, C. Weijzen, N. Dukers-Muijrers, P. Wolffs, C. Hoebe","doi":"10.1136/SEXTRANS-2021-STI.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have revolutionized our ability to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis (CT). Sometimes, in addition, assessment of CT viability would help to gain more insight in the clinical impact of a positive NAAT. Methods to assess the CT viability have become available in research settings (e.g. viability-PCR; V-PCR). Here we assess viability in six different anatomic sites in women. Methods Immediately prior to treatment (STI clinic South Limburg), 28 vaginal NAAT-CT-positive (COBAS4800 CT/NG) adult women, were included in the ‘CHLAMOUR’ study. We used V-PCR to assess CT viable load (log10 CT/ml) in same clinician taken standardized samples from the cervix, vagina, perineum, anus, optional rectum, and pharynx. Mean loads were compared using t-tests. Results Twenty-eight women were included of whom 68% (19/28) consented to proctoscopic examination (rectal). NAAT-CT-positive rate was 75% for cervix, 79% vagina, 64% perineum, 64% anus, 74% rectum, and 21% for pharynx. Viable load was detected in 90% (19/21) CT positive cervix, 77% (17/22) vagina, 11% (2/18) perineum, 61% (11/18) anal, 93% (13/14) rectal, and 0% (0/6) pharynx samples. The mean viable load was marginally higher in cervical compared to vaginal samples (4.37 [SD:1.35] vs. 3.45 [SD:1.05], p=0.055). Mean viable load was higher in rectal compared to anal samples (3.51 [SD:0.51] vs. 2.70 [SD:0.42], p=0.01). Viable load was 2.72 [SD:1.69] CT positive perineum samples. Conclusions The amount of viable CT varied by anatomic site, and were highest ‘upward in the body’, which is thus likely to represent actual site of infection. Still, the vaginal and anal sites (that are usually self-sampled) had high concordance with the cervical and rectal sites. CT at the perineum may indicate autoinoculation. Notably, the presence of viable CT in anorectal samples indicated the presence of an active anorectal infection, which should be accounted for in comprehensive CT management.","PeriodicalId":333492,"journal":{"name":"Late breakers","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Late breakers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/SEXTRANS-2021-STI.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have revolutionized our ability to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis (CT). Sometimes, in addition, assessment of CT viability would help to gain more insight in the clinical impact of a positive NAAT. Methods to assess the CT viability have become available in research settings (e.g. viability-PCR; V-PCR). Here we assess viability in six different anatomic sites in women. Methods Immediately prior to treatment (STI clinic South Limburg), 28 vaginal NAAT-CT-positive (COBAS4800 CT/NG) adult women, were included in the ‘CHLAMOUR’ study. We used V-PCR to assess CT viable load (log10 CT/ml) in same clinician taken standardized samples from the cervix, vagina, perineum, anus, optional rectum, and pharynx. Mean loads were compared using t-tests. Results Twenty-eight women were included of whom 68% (19/28) consented to proctoscopic examination (rectal). NAAT-CT-positive rate was 75% for cervix, 79% vagina, 64% perineum, 64% anus, 74% rectum, and 21% for pharynx. Viable load was detected in 90% (19/21) CT positive cervix, 77% (17/22) vagina, 11% (2/18) perineum, 61% (11/18) anal, 93% (13/14) rectal, and 0% (0/6) pharynx samples. The mean viable load was marginally higher in cervical compared to vaginal samples (4.37 [SD:1.35] vs. 3.45 [SD:1.05], p=0.055). Mean viable load was higher in rectal compared to anal samples (3.51 [SD:0.51] vs. 2.70 [SD:0.42], p=0.01). Viable load was 2.72 [SD:1.69] CT positive perineum samples. Conclusions The amount of viable CT varied by anatomic site, and were highest ‘upward in the body’, which is thus likely to represent actual site of infection. Still, the vaginal and anal sites (that are usually self-sampled) had high concordance with the cervical and rectal sites. CT at the perineum may indicate autoinoculation. Notably, the presence of viable CT in anorectal samples indicated the presence of an active anorectal infection, which should be accounted for in comprehensive CT management.
O20.6女性6个不同解剖样本部位沙眼衣原体活菌载量(CHLAMOUR)
核酸扩增试验(NAATs)彻底改变了我们诊断沙眼衣原体(CT)的能力。此外,有时,CT生存能力评估将有助于更多地了解NAAT阳性的临床影响。在研究环境中,评估CT活力的方法已经可用(例如,活力- pcr;V-PCR)。在这里,我们评估生存能力在六个不同的解剖部位的妇女。方法在接受治疗前(South Limburg性病诊所),28名阴道naat -CT阳性(COBAS4800 CT/NG)的成年女性被纳入“CHLAMOUR”研究。我们使用V-PCR评估同一临床医生从子宫颈、阴道、会阴、肛门、可选直肠和咽采集的标准化样本的CT活负荷(log10 CT/ml)。平均负荷比较采用t检验。结果共纳入28例妇女,其中68%(19/28)同意行直肠直肠镜检查。naat - ct阳性率宫颈75%,阴道79%,会阴64%,肛门64%,直肠74%,咽21%。90% (19/21) CT阳性子宫颈、77%(17/22)阴道、11%(2/18)会阴、61%(11/18)肛门、93%(13/14)直肠和0%(0/6)咽标本检出活菌负荷。宫颈样本的平均活菌负荷略高于阴道样本(4.37 [SD:1.35]比3.45 [SD:1.05], p=0.055)。直肠样本的平均活菌负荷高于肛门样本(3.51 [SD:0.51]比2.70 [SD:0.42], p=0.01)。活菌负荷为2.72 [SD:1.69]。结论活体CT值因解剖部位不同而不同,以“体内向上”最高,可能代表实际感染部位。尽管如此,阴道和肛门部位(通常是自我取样)与宫颈和直肠部位高度一致。会阴CT提示自体接种。值得注意的是,在肛门直肠样本中存在活CT表明存在活动性肛门直肠感染,这应该在全面的CT管理中得到考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信