Estimating Energy Price Elasticities When Salience Is High: Residential Natural Gas Demand in Ukraine

A. Alberini, Olha Khymych, Milan Ščasný
{"title":"Estimating Energy Price Elasticities When Salience Is High: Residential Natural Gas Demand in Ukraine","authors":"A. Alberini, Olha Khymych, Milan Ščasný","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3357039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its importance for policy purposes (including climate policy and the energy transition), evidence about the price elasticity of natural gas demand in the residential sector is very limited and based on inference from situations with modest variation in prices. We focus on a locale and time when price changes were extreme and presumably salient to consumers, namely Ukraine between 2013 and 2017. We exploit the tariff reforms and detailed micro-level household consumption records to estimate the price elasticity of the demand for natural gas. To isolate behavior, attention is restricted to those households that made no structural energy-efficiency upgrades to their homes, and thus kept the stock of gas-using capital fixed. We further examine the short-run elasticity by restricting the sample to a few months before and after the tariff changes. Our results suggest that under extreme price changes, households are capable of reducing consumption, even without installing insulation or making any other structural modifications to their homes. The price elasticity is about -0.16. Wealthier households, people living in multifamily buildings, and heavy users have more inelastic demands. Households reduced consumption even when they received “subsidies,†namely lump-sum government assistance, suggesting that when the price signal is sufficiently strong, lump-sum transfers have only a minimal effect on consumption. We also find some evidence that the stronger the salience, the stronger the responsiveness to price, although this effect is modest and may partly overlap with that of income or baseline consumption. Our data also suggest that the consumers with the lowest uptake of energy efficiency improvements might be those who—by necessity or through skills—are the most productive at reducing energy use through behaviors.","PeriodicalId":105811,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Agriculture","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3357039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Despite its importance for policy purposes (including climate policy and the energy transition), evidence about the price elasticity of natural gas demand in the residential sector is very limited and based on inference from situations with modest variation in prices. We focus on a locale and time when price changes were extreme and presumably salient to consumers, namely Ukraine between 2013 and 2017. We exploit the tariff reforms and detailed micro-level household consumption records to estimate the price elasticity of the demand for natural gas. To isolate behavior, attention is restricted to those households that made no structural energy-efficiency upgrades to their homes, and thus kept the stock of gas-using capital fixed. We further examine the short-run elasticity by restricting the sample to a few months before and after the tariff changes. Our results suggest that under extreme price changes, households are capable of reducing consumption, even without installing insulation or making any other structural modifications to their homes. The price elasticity is about -0.16. Wealthier households, people living in multifamily buildings, and heavy users have more inelastic demands. Households reduced consumption even when they received “subsidies,†namely lump-sum government assistance, suggesting that when the price signal is sufficiently strong, lump-sum transfers have only a minimal effect on consumption. We also find some evidence that the stronger the salience, the stronger the responsiveness to price, although this effect is modest and may partly overlap with that of income or baseline consumption. Our data also suggest that the consumers with the lowest uptake of energy efficiency improvements might be those who—by necessity or through skills—are the most productive at reducing energy use through behaviors.
当显著性较高时估计能源价格弹性:乌克兰居民天然气需求
尽管它对政策目的(包括气候政策和能源转型)很重要,但关于住宅部门天然气需求价格弹性的证据非常有限,而且是基于价格适度变化情况的推断。我们关注的是价格变化极端的地点和时间,可能对消费者来说很明显,即2013年至2017年的乌克兰。我们利用关税改革和详细的微观家庭消费记录来估计天然气需求的价格弹性。为了隔离行为,注意力被限制在那些没有对其房屋进行结构性节能升级的家庭,从而使天然气使用资本的存量保持固定。我们通过将样本限制在关税变化前后的几个月来进一步检验短期弹性。我们的研究结果表明,在极端的价格变化下,家庭有能力减少消费,即使不安装隔热材料或对房屋进行任何其他结构改造。价格弹性约为-0.16。较富裕的家庭、住在多户住宅中的人以及重度用户有更多的非弹性需求。即使家庭获得了欧元œsubsidies,即一次性政府援助,他们也减少了消费,这表明当价格信号足够强烈时,一次性转移对消费的影响很小。我们还发现一些证据表明,显著性越强,对价格的反应性就越强,尽管这种影响是适度的,可能部分与收入或基线消费的影响重叠。我们的数据还表明,对提高能源效率的接受程度最低的消费者,可能是那些通过行为减少能源使用效率最高的人——无论是出于必要性还是通过技能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信