Standards as Hybrids: An Essay on Tensions and Juxtapositions in Contemporary Standardization

V. Fomin
{"title":"Standards as Hybrids: An Essay on Tensions and Juxtapositions in Contemporary Standardization","authors":"V. Fomin","doi":"10.4018/jitsr.2012070105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today the political rhetoric of the European Union is focused on the transformation from service/industrial to Information Society – the concept emphasizing the role of national and global information infrastructures in the economic development of the state (Castells, 1996). Guided by the vision as laid out in European Commission’s programme “eEurope,” European societies and economies are accelerating the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in a hope to be able to fully exploit the potential of the new informational economy, which is expected to bring not less than a “tremendous potential for growth, employment and inclusion”1 (Council of the European Union, 1999, p.4). Similar to the processes of interconnecting roads and railways, bolts and nuts in the formation of the industrial economies, building informational economy requires networking of myriad of disparate information systems and resources on different levels of social organizing. Inter-operating informational resources and systems, making a “workable whole” out of disparate local implementations, brings about new requirements and dynamics unknown in the construction of industrial age infrastructure – the instantaneity of production and delivery of services, the inter-modality of different infrastructures (such as e.g., cellular mobile, the Internet, TV, radio, GPS) (Edwards, 2000), consistency of informational resources (Gill & Miller, 2002), a host of security-, safetyand privacy-related issues – just few to mention. With new unthinkable levels of complexity in assuring interoperability of informational tools and resources, scholars of standardization and infrastructure development are operating with theories on standards competition and interoperability based on the knowledge of pre-informational age, and the validity of the extant theories is tried and often refuted as new cases of informational age are studied. To take few examples, competition of Open Document Format (ODF) and Microsoft’s Office Open XML (OOXML) file formats is not like typical standards contests as we know from the Standards as Hybrids: An Essay on Tensions and Juxtapositions in Contemporary Standardization","PeriodicalId":169063,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res.","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jitsr.2012070105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Today the political rhetoric of the European Union is focused on the transformation from service/industrial to Information Society – the concept emphasizing the role of national and global information infrastructures in the economic development of the state (Castells, 1996). Guided by the vision as laid out in European Commission’s programme “eEurope,” European societies and economies are accelerating the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in a hope to be able to fully exploit the potential of the new informational economy, which is expected to bring not less than a “tremendous potential for growth, employment and inclusion”1 (Council of the European Union, 1999, p.4). Similar to the processes of interconnecting roads and railways, bolts and nuts in the formation of the industrial economies, building informational economy requires networking of myriad of disparate information systems and resources on different levels of social organizing. Inter-operating informational resources and systems, making a “workable whole” out of disparate local implementations, brings about new requirements and dynamics unknown in the construction of industrial age infrastructure – the instantaneity of production and delivery of services, the inter-modality of different infrastructures (such as e.g., cellular mobile, the Internet, TV, radio, GPS) (Edwards, 2000), consistency of informational resources (Gill & Miller, 2002), a host of security-, safetyand privacy-related issues – just few to mention. With new unthinkable levels of complexity in assuring interoperability of informational tools and resources, scholars of standardization and infrastructure development are operating with theories on standards competition and interoperability based on the knowledge of pre-informational age, and the validity of the extant theories is tried and often refuted as new cases of informational age are studied. To take few examples, competition of Open Document Format (ODF) and Microsoft’s Office Open XML (OOXML) file formats is not like typical standards contests as we know from the Standards as Hybrids: An Essay on Tensions and Juxtapositions in Contemporary Standardization
作为混合体的标准:一篇关于当代标准化的紧张和并列的文章
今天,欧盟的政治言论集中在从服务/工业到信息社会的转变上——这个概念强调了国家和全球信息基础设施在国家经济发展中的作用(卡斯特,1996)。在欧洲委员会“eEurope”方案所提出的愿景的指导下,欧洲社会和经济正在加速使用信息和通信技术,以期能够充分利用新的信息经济的潜力,预计这将带来不少于“增长、就业和包容的巨大潜力”1(欧洲联盟理事会,1999年,第4页)。与工业经济形成过程中公路和铁路的互联互通、螺栓和螺母的连接过程类似,构建信息经济需要在不同的社会组织层面上将无数不同的信息系统和资源联网。互操作的信息资源和系统,使不同的本地实现成为一个“可行的整体”,带来了工业时代基础设施建设中未知的新需求和动态-生产和提供服务的即时性,不同基础设施的互模性(例如,蜂窝移动,互联网,电视,无线电,GPS)(爱德华兹,2000),信息资源的一致性(吉尔和米勒,2002),一系列安全-,安全和隐私相关的问题——仅举几例。在确保信息工具和资源的互操作性方面出现了新的难以想象的复杂程度,标准化和基础设施发展的学者们正在运用基于前信息时代知识的标准竞争和互操作性理论,现有理论的有效性在研究信息时代的新案例时受到考验,但往往遭到驳斥。举几个例子,开放文档格式(ODF)和微软Office开放XML (OOXML)文件格式之间的竞争并不像我们从《作为混合的标准:当代标准化中的紧张和并列》一书中了解到的那种典型的标准竞争
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信