{"title":"European Union Funding and Sub-National Euroscepticism: Evidence From Poland","authors":"A. Hartnett, Alexander Gard-Murray","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3325608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tests whether EU transfers make beneficiaries more or less supportive of the European project. This question is especially relevant as anti-EU are becoming more electorally competitive across Europe. The European Commission states that their funding programs aim to achieve greater social and economic cohesion among EU member states. Yet, it is puzzling that across Europe, eurosceptic attitudes are clearly evident in regions that benefit most from EU funds (Becker et al., 2017; Richards et al., 2018). We address this puzzle by dis-aggregating EU funding at the local and individual levels in the EU’s highest net-beneficiary country, Poland. Using county-level data on EU funding beneficiaries and individual panel data from the Polish Social Diagnosis Survey, we find a positive association between EU agricultural spending and euroscepticism as measured by voting and attitudinal data. By examining the relationship between EU aid and eurosceptic political behavior and opinions, this project sheds light on the political economy of transfers and calls into question the unifying potential of agricultural spending.","PeriodicalId":137820,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: National","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3325608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article tests whether EU transfers make beneficiaries more or less supportive of the European project. This question is especially relevant as anti-EU are becoming more electorally competitive across Europe. The European Commission states that their funding programs aim to achieve greater social and economic cohesion among EU member states. Yet, it is puzzling that across Europe, eurosceptic attitudes are clearly evident in regions that benefit most from EU funds (Becker et al., 2017; Richards et al., 2018). We address this puzzle by dis-aggregating EU funding at the local and individual levels in the EU’s highest net-beneficiary country, Poland. Using county-level data on EU funding beneficiaries and individual panel data from the Polish Social Diagnosis Survey, we find a positive association between EU agricultural spending and euroscepticism as measured by voting and attitudinal data. By examining the relationship between EU aid and eurosceptic political behavior and opinions, this project sheds light on the political economy of transfers and calls into question the unifying potential of agricultural spending.
本文将检验欧盟的转移支付是否会使受益者更多或更少地支持欧洲项目。这个问题尤其重要,因为反欧盟在整个欧洲的选举竞争正变得越来越激烈。欧盟委员会表示,他们的资助计划旨在实现欧盟成员国之间更大的社会和经济凝聚力。然而,令人困惑的是,在整个欧洲,在从欧盟资金中受益最多的地区,对欧洲的怀疑态度非常明显(Becker et al., 2017;Richards et al., 2018)。我们通过对欧盟最高净受益国波兰的地方和个人层面的欧盟资金进行分类,解决了这个难题。使用欧盟资助受益人的县级数据和来自波兰社会诊断调查的个人小组数据,我们发现欧盟农业支出与欧洲怀疑主义之间存在正相关关系,通过投票和态度数据来衡量。通过研究欧盟援助与欧洲怀疑主义政治行为和观点之间的关系,该项目揭示了转移支付的政治经济学,并对农业支出的统一潜力提出了质疑。