European Union Funding and Sub-National Euroscepticism: Evidence From Poland

A. Hartnett, Alexander Gard-Murray
{"title":"European Union Funding and Sub-National Euroscepticism: Evidence From Poland","authors":"A. Hartnett, Alexander Gard-Murray","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3325608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tests whether EU transfers make beneficiaries more or less supportive of the European project. This question is especially relevant as anti-EU are becoming more electorally competitive across Europe. The European Commission states that their funding programs aim to achieve greater social and economic cohesion among EU member states. Yet, it is puzzling that across Europe, eurosceptic attitudes are clearly evident in regions that benefit most from EU funds (Becker et al., 2017; Richards et al., 2018). We address this puzzle by dis-aggregating EU funding at the local and individual levels in the EU’s highest net-beneficiary country, Poland. Using county-level data on EU funding beneficiaries and individual panel data from the Polish Social Diagnosis Survey, we find a positive association between EU agricultural spending and euroscepticism as measured by voting and attitudinal data. By examining the relationship between EU aid and eurosceptic political behavior and opinions, this project sheds light on the political economy of transfers and calls into question the unifying potential of agricultural spending.","PeriodicalId":137820,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: National","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3325608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article tests whether EU transfers make beneficiaries more or less supportive of the European project. This question is especially relevant as anti-EU are becoming more electorally competitive across Europe. The European Commission states that their funding programs aim to achieve greater social and economic cohesion among EU member states. Yet, it is puzzling that across Europe, eurosceptic attitudes are clearly evident in regions that benefit most from EU funds (Becker et al., 2017; Richards et al., 2018). We address this puzzle by dis-aggregating EU funding at the local and individual levels in the EU’s highest net-beneficiary country, Poland. Using county-level data on EU funding beneficiaries and individual panel data from the Polish Social Diagnosis Survey, we find a positive association between EU agricultural spending and euroscepticism as measured by voting and attitudinal data. By examining the relationship between EU aid and eurosceptic political behavior and opinions, this project sheds light on the political economy of transfers and calls into question the unifying potential of agricultural spending.
欧盟资助和次国家欧洲怀疑主义:来自波兰的证据
本文将检验欧盟的转移支付是否会使受益者更多或更少地支持欧洲项目。这个问题尤其重要,因为反欧盟在整个欧洲的选举竞争正变得越来越激烈。欧盟委员会表示,他们的资助计划旨在实现欧盟成员国之间更大的社会和经济凝聚力。然而,令人困惑的是,在整个欧洲,在从欧盟资金中受益最多的地区,对欧洲的怀疑态度非常明显(Becker et al., 2017;Richards et al., 2018)。我们通过对欧盟最高净受益国波兰的地方和个人层面的欧盟资金进行分类,解决了这个难题。使用欧盟资助受益人的县级数据和来自波兰社会诊断调查的个人小组数据,我们发现欧盟农业支出与欧洲怀疑主义之间存在正相关关系,通过投票和态度数据来衡量。通过研究欧盟援助与欧洲怀疑主义政治行为和观点之间的关系,该项目揭示了转移支付的政治经济学,并对农业支出的统一潜力提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信