A new approach for case presentation classes

G. Judd
{"title":"A new approach for case presentation classes","authors":"G. Judd","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.2001.960497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an approach for those courses in which student teams make a single major presentation, each presentation based upon a different case during the course. While the presentation role with all of its advantages is retained, two new roles, that of board of directors and that of evaluators are introduced. The new roles provide several advantages over the traditional approach. The number of role-active participants in each case is tripled while the number of viewpoints with which the case is approached is similarly increased. The learning experiences from the cases deepen as students take on not only a presentation role, but also that of a board of directors with the responsibility for questioning the presenters and of evaluators judging and commenting upon the other participating teams. The performances of all three teams are discussed openly in review sessions after each case. The strengths and weaknesses of all the teams are identified first by the student teams themselves and then by the instructor. The entire evaluation and discussion are used as learning opportunities for all in the class. In course evaluations, the students have indicated strong appreciation and positive attitudes toward this new case study organization format.","PeriodicalId":376256,"journal":{"name":"IEMC'01 Proceedings. Change Management and the New Industrial Revolution. IEMC-2001 (Cat. No.01CH37286)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEMC'01 Proceedings. Change Management and the New Industrial Revolution. IEMC-2001 (Cat. No.01CH37286)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2001.960497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes an approach for those courses in which student teams make a single major presentation, each presentation based upon a different case during the course. While the presentation role with all of its advantages is retained, two new roles, that of board of directors and that of evaluators are introduced. The new roles provide several advantages over the traditional approach. The number of role-active participants in each case is tripled while the number of viewpoints with which the case is approached is similarly increased. The learning experiences from the cases deepen as students take on not only a presentation role, but also that of a board of directors with the responsibility for questioning the presenters and of evaluators judging and commenting upon the other participating teams. The performances of all three teams are discussed openly in review sessions after each case. The strengths and weaknesses of all the teams are identified first by the student teams themselves and then by the instructor. The entire evaluation and discussion are used as learning opportunities for all in the class. In course evaluations, the students have indicated strong appreciation and positive attitudes toward this new case study organization format.
案例表示类的新方法
本文描述了一种方法,在这些课程中,学生团队做一个主要的报告,每个报告基于课程中的不同案例。在保留陈述角色及其所有优点的同时,引入了两个新的角色,即董事会角色和评价者角色。与传统方法相比,新角色提供了几个优势。在每个案例中,角色积极参与者的数量增加了三倍,而处理案例的观点数量也同样增加了。当学生们不仅扮演了演讲的角色,还扮演了董事会的角色,负责向演讲者提问,并对其他参赛团队进行评判和评论,从案例中获得的学习经验就会加深。在每个案例之后的回顾会议上,所有三个团队的表现都会被公开讨论。所有团队的优势和劣势首先由学生团队自己确定,然后由教师确定。整个评估和讨论都是全班同学学习的机会。在课程评估中,学生对这种新的案例研究组织形式表现出强烈的赞赏和积极的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信