Investigating accuracy disparities for gender classification using convolutional neural networks

Lia Chin-Purcell, America Chambers
{"title":"Investigating accuracy disparities for gender classification using convolutional neural networks","authors":"Lia Chin-Purcell, America Chambers","doi":"10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automatic gender recognition (AGR) is a subfield of facial recognition that has recently been scrutinized for bias in the form of misgendering and erasure against various identity groups in our society. Recent studies have found that several commercial AGR classifiers (from Microsoft, IMB, Face++) are biased against women and darker-skinned people as well as gender non-binary people [8, 11]. In this work, we investigate and quantify AGR classifier bias against transgender people by developing and evaluating three different convolutional neural networks (CNN): using images of cisgender individuals, using images of transgender individuals, and using images of both cisgender and transgender individuals. We find that the cisgender trained classifier is 91.7% accurate when evaluated on cisgender people, but only 68.9% accurate when evaluated on transgender people, with the worst performance of 38.6% precision for transgender men. We investigate this low precision further by performing additional experiments where various parts of the face are obscured. We end with recommendations for commercial classifiers based upon our findings.","PeriodicalId":314239,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automatic gender recognition (AGR) is a subfield of facial recognition that has recently been scrutinized for bias in the form of misgendering and erasure against various identity groups in our society. Recent studies have found that several commercial AGR classifiers (from Microsoft, IMB, Face++) are biased against women and darker-skinned people as well as gender non-binary people [8, 11]. In this work, we investigate and quantify AGR classifier bias against transgender people by developing and evaluating three different convolutional neural networks (CNN): using images of cisgender individuals, using images of transgender individuals, and using images of both cisgender and transgender individuals. We find that the cisgender trained classifier is 91.7% accurate when evaluated on cisgender people, but only 68.9% accurate when evaluated on transgender people, with the worst performance of 38.6% precision for transgender men. We investigate this low precision further by performing additional experiments where various parts of the face are obscured. We end with recommendations for commercial classifiers based upon our findings.
使用卷积神经网络研究性别分类的准确性差异
自动性别识别(AGR)是面部识别的一个子领域,最近受到了以性别错误和对社会中各种身份群体的抹除为形式的偏见的审查。最近的研究发现,一些商业AGR分类器(来自Microsoft、IMB、face++)对女性和深肤色人群以及性别非二元人群存在偏见[8,11]。在这项工作中,我们通过开发和评估三种不同的卷积神经网络(CNN)来调查和量化AGR分类器对变性人的偏见:使用顺性别个体的图像,使用跨性别个体的图像,以及使用顺性别和跨性别个体的图像。我们发现顺性别训练的分类器在评估顺性别者时准确率为91.7%,但在评估跨性别者时准确率仅为68.9%,其中对跨性别男性的准确率最差,为38.6%。我们通过执行额外的实验来进一步研究这种低精度,其中面部的各个部分被遮挡。最后,我们根据我们的发现对商业分类器提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信