CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE AMBIVALENT POTENTIALS OF SOCIAL MEDIA USE IN COVID 19 PANDEMIC CAMPAIGNS

E. Ezebuenyi, Rosemary Obianuju Ekwunife, Felicia Chinyere Nweke
{"title":"CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE AMBIVALENT POTENTIALS OF SOCIAL MEDIA USE IN COVID 19 PANDEMIC CAMPAIGNS","authors":"E. Ezebuenyi, Rosemary Obianuju Ekwunife, Felicia Chinyere Nweke","doi":"10.47851/naujocommed.v1i1.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fear created by the Coronavirus as seen in the world today and the manner social media is churning out all manner of information (misinformation, disinformation, memes, innuendos, half - truths, lies etc.) about its cure and prevention is creating a situation of uncertainty. The situation becomes more disturbing since none of the claims in social media platforms regarding the therapies and recipes (solutions) for the cure or prevention of COVID-19 has been approved or certified by the World Health Organisation (WHO) or the Centre for Disease Control (CDC). It seems, however, that only the prevalence of social media can suffice for the provision of adequate, regular and up - to - date information on the pandemic. This can also explain the reason for leveraging social media platforms to enhance fast and wide diffusion of knowledge about Coronavirus all over the world. By its nature, social media allows for information to be readily shared – a role it has seemingly played in the face of the COVID- 19 pandemic - and unlike traditional news outlets there is no filter, no fact - checking and often a lot of bias. It becomes imperative therefore to assess the ambivalent potentials which social media display in the face of COVID- 19 pandemic vis-à-vis the impacts they have on the consumers of the information. The paper adopted the library research approach in which relevant conceptual literatures and empirical studies were analysed with the aim to ascertain whether social media display ambivalence in the campaign against the spread of COVID-19. The paper found, among others that the ambivalent potentials of social media use in the campaign against COVID-19 was glaring. It recommends, among others that consumers of social media products in this period should listen more to and, or check for updates by governments and other authorised agencies such as WHO and CDC rather than relying on unwholesome information from social media platforms.","PeriodicalId":233484,"journal":{"name":"Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of Communication and Media Studies","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of Communication and Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47851/naujocommed.v1i1.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The fear created by the Coronavirus as seen in the world today and the manner social media is churning out all manner of information (misinformation, disinformation, memes, innuendos, half - truths, lies etc.) about its cure and prevention is creating a situation of uncertainty. The situation becomes more disturbing since none of the claims in social media platforms regarding the therapies and recipes (solutions) for the cure or prevention of COVID-19 has been approved or certified by the World Health Organisation (WHO) or the Centre for Disease Control (CDC). It seems, however, that only the prevalence of social media can suffice for the provision of adequate, regular and up - to - date information on the pandemic. This can also explain the reason for leveraging social media platforms to enhance fast and wide diffusion of knowledge about Coronavirus all over the world. By its nature, social media allows for information to be readily shared – a role it has seemingly played in the face of the COVID- 19 pandemic - and unlike traditional news outlets there is no filter, no fact - checking and often a lot of bias. It becomes imperative therefore to assess the ambivalent potentials which social media display in the face of COVID- 19 pandemic vis-à-vis the impacts they have on the consumers of the information. The paper adopted the library research approach in which relevant conceptual literatures and empirical studies were analysed with the aim to ascertain whether social media display ambivalence in the campaign against the spread of COVID-19. The paper found, among others that the ambivalent potentials of social media use in the campaign against COVID-19 was glaring. It recommends, among others that consumers of social media products in this period should listen more to and, or check for updates by governments and other authorised agencies such as WHO and CDC rather than relying on unwholesome information from social media platforms.
对社交媒体在covid - 19大流行运动中使用的矛盾潜力进行批判性评估
正如当今世界所看到的,冠状病毒造成的恐惧,以及社交媒体大量发布有关其治疗和预防的各种信息(错误信息、虚假信息、表情包、含沙射影、半真半假、谎言等)的方式,正在造成一种不确定的局面。社交媒体平台上关于治疗或预防COVID-19的疗法和配方(解决方案)的说法,没有一个得到世界卫生组织(世卫组织)或疾病控制中心(CDC)的批准或认证,这种情况更加令人不安。然而,似乎只有社会媒体的普及才足以提供关于这一流行病的充分、定期和最新的信息。这也可以解释为什么要利用社交媒体平台在全球范围内快速、广泛地传播有关冠状病毒的知识。就其本质而言,社交媒体允许信息随时共享——面对COVID- 19大流行,它似乎发挥了这一作用——与传统新闻媒体不同,社交媒体没有过滤器,没有事实核查,往往有很多偏见。因此,必须评估社交媒体在面对COVID- 19大流行时所表现出的矛盾潜力与-à-vis它们对信息消费者的影响。本文采用图书馆研究方法,对相关概念文献和实证研究进行分析,旨在确定社交媒体在对抗COVID-19传播的运动中是否表现出矛盾心理。该论文发现,除其他外,社交媒体在抗击COVID-19运动中的矛盾潜力是显而易见的。它建议,在此期间,社交媒体产品的消费者应该更多地听取或查看政府和其他授权机构(如世卫组织和疾病预防控制中心)的最新信息,而不是依赖社交媒体平台上的不健康信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信