GIS ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL ACCESSIBILITY TO FOOD MARKETS IN THARAKA REGION OF KENYA

Dickson Kinoti Kibetu
{"title":"GIS ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL ACCESSIBILITY TO FOOD MARKETS IN THARAKA REGION OF KENYA","authors":"Dickson Kinoti Kibetu","doi":"10.15414/raae.2020.23.02.36-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In semi-arid rural Kenya, most households travel long distances to access food markets. This has negative effects on food consumption and the use of market facilities. Over70 % of farmers in Tharaka Constituency lack access to formal markets often relying on contracted middlemen who buy at farm gate for traders in major urban centres. Studies on intra-variation in accessibility to market services remains scanty, yet market purchases account for most food consumed across urban and rural areas. Distance defines accessibility and performance of market facilities in most areas where food insecurity and malnutrition are common. This study used Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to measure physical accessibility to open air markets within semi-arid Tharaka, a constituency where vulnerability to acute food shortage is comparatively high. Normative, administrative and geospatial datasets were used in the analysis. Results showed that geographic accessibility to local market centres vary spatially across the villages. In terms of market accessibility, 40.4% of the total population live in areas with high inaccessibility risks while 36.1% are found in places with low inaccessibility risks and only 23.5% of the population exists in areas with moderate inaccessibility risks. This means a large proportion of deprived population live in villages within high to very high inaccessibility risk areas. This spatial inequity has implications on household food security and explains the chronic problems of hunger and malnutrition experienced in the area. Therefore, markets within high inaccessibility risk areas should be upgraded and infrastructure thereof improved to enable food mobility across these areas.","PeriodicalId":320413,"journal":{"name":"Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15414/raae.2020.23.02.36-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In semi-arid rural Kenya, most households travel long distances to access food markets. This has negative effects on food consumption and the use of market facilities. Over70 % of farmers in Tharaka Constituency lack access to formal markets often relying on contracted middlemen who buy at farm gate for traders in major urban centres. Studies on intra-variation in accessibility to market services remains scanty, yet market purchases account for most food consumed across urban and rural areas. Distance defines accessibility and performance of market facilities in most areas where food insecurity and malnutrition are common. This study used Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to measure physical accessibility to open air markets within semi-arid Tharaka, a constituency where vulnerability to acute food shortage is comparatively high. Normative, administrative and geospatial datasets were used in the analysis. Results showed that geographic accessibility to local market centres vary spatially across the villages. In terms of market accessibility, 40.4% of the total population live in areas with high inaccessibility risks while 36.1% are found in places with low inaccessibility risks and only 23.5% of the population exists in areas with moderate inaccessibility risks. This means a large proportion of deprived population live in villages within high to very high inaccessibility risk areas. This spatial inequity has implications on household food security and explains the chronic problems of hunger and malnutrition experienced in the area. Therefore, markets within high inaccessibility risk areas should be upgraded and infrastructure thereof improved to enable food mobility across these areas.
地理信息系统对肯尼亚塔拉卡地区粮食市场实际可达性的分析
在半干旱的肯尼亚农村,大多数家庭要走很远的路才能到达食品市场。这对食品消费和市场设施的使用产生了负面影响。在塔拉卡选区,超过70%的农民无法进入正规市场,他们往往依赖于签约的中间商,这些中间商在农场门口为主要城市中心的贸易商购买农产品。关于市场服务可及性的内部差异的研究仍然很少,但市场购买占城乡地区消费的大部分粮食。在粮食不安全和营养不良普遍存在的大多数地区,距离决定了市场设施的可及性和性能。本研究利用地理信息系统(GIS)测量了半干旱的塔拉卡地区露天市场的实际可达性,该地区严重粮食短缺的脆弱性相对较高。在分析中使用了规范、行政和地理空间数据集。结果表明,各个村庄到当地市场中心的地理可达性在空间上存在差异。在市场可达性方面,40.4%的人口生活在高可达性风险区,36.1%的人口生活在低可达性风险区,23.5%的人口生活在中等可达性风险区。这意味着很大一部分贫困人口生活在高至极高难以进入风险地区的村庄。这种空间不平等对家庭粮食安全产生影响,并解释了该地区长期存在的饥饿和营养不良问题。因此,应升级高不可达风险地区的市场,并改善其基础设施,以实现这些地区的粮食流动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信