Mapping of Reflective Thinking Levels and Basic Thinking Ability of Students on Learning Science at SMP Negeri 30 Sigi

Delviana Delviana, B. Hamzah, Solfarina Solfarina
{"title":"Mapping of Reflective Thinking Levels and Basic Thinking Ability of Students on Learning Science at SMP Negeri 30 Sigi","authors":"Delviana Delviana, B. Hamzah, Solfarina Solfarina","doi":"10.22487/j25490192.2020.v4.i1.pp53-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to map the reflective thinking level of students and to map students' basic thinking skills in science learning at SMP Negeri 30 Sigi. The method used in this research is the descriptive method. The test used is a set of tests containing UN questions for the last five years about science learning given to students with the aim of obtaining information about students' basic thinking levels while measuring reflective thinking skills using a questionnaire that has been validated by experts. Students of SMP N 30 Sigi have very low basic thinking skills. The highest correct answer is 21 questions and the lowest correct answer is 7 questions. A total of 42 students as a whole had a reflective thinking stage for habitual action, 29 of which were transitions between habitual action and understanding, 11 of which were transitioning to habitual action, understanding, and reflective, and only 2 of them reached the critical thinking stage. Students 'reflective thinking skills are directly proportional to students' basic thinking skills. The higher the students 'reflective thinking stages, the better the students' basic thinking skills.","PeriodicalId":373677,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22487/j25490192.2020.v4.i1.pp53-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to map the reflective thinking level of students and to map students' basic thinking skills in science learning at SMP Negeri 30 Sigi. The method used in this research is the descriptive method. The test used is a set of tests containing UN questions for the last five years about science learning given to students with the aim of obtaining information about students' basic thinking levels while measuring reflective thinking skills using a questionnaire that has been validated by experts. Students of SMP N 30 Sigi have very low basic thinking skills. The highest correct answer is 21 questions and the lowest correct answer is 7 questions. A total of 42 students as a whole had a reflective thinking stage for habitual action, 29 of which were transitions between habitual action and understanding, 11 of which were transitioning to habitual action, understanding, and reflective, and only 2 of them reached the critical thinking stage. Students 'reflective thinking skills are directly proportional to students' basic thinking skills. The higher the students 'reflective thinking stages, the better the students' basic thinking skills.
中学学生在科学学习中的反思思维水平与基本思维能力的映射[j]
本研究旨在绘制学生的反思思维水平,并绘制学生在SMP Negeri 30 Sigi科学学习中的基本思维技能。本研究采用的方法是描述性方法。所使用的测试是一套测试,其中包含联合国过去五年向学生提供的有关科学学习的问题,目的是获取有关学生基本思维水平的信息,同时使用经专家验证的问卷来衡量反思性思维技能。SMP n30 Sigi的学生基本思维能力很低。最高的正确答案是21题,最低的正确答案是7题。共有42名学生整体进入习惯行为反思性思维阶段,其中29名学生处于习惯行为与理解之间的过渡阶段,11名学生处于习惯行为、理解和反思之间的过渡阶段,只有2名学生进入批判性思维阶段。学生的反思性思维能力与学生的基本思维能力成正比。学生反思性思维阶段越高,学生的基本思维能力越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信