Combining Building Simulation and Sensitivity Analysis for the Evaluation of Passive Design Approaches for Residential Buildings in Nigeria

Iko Tambaya
{"title":"Combining Building Simulation and Sensitivity Analysis for the Evaluation of Passive Design Approaches for Residential Buildings in Nigeria","authors":"Iko Tambaya","doi":"10.20900/jsr20230007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates different passive design measures to improve residential buildings’ energy efficiency and mitigate the effects of climate change. To identify the best passive design strategy for the climate under study, a four-Bedroom one-storey modern residential building for singlefamily was picked within the hot-dry climate zone of Nigeria as a case study. A questionnaire survey was adopted to ascertain the thermophysical properties of the building envelope, energy consumption by taking meter readings, occupancy behaviour and electricity supply schedule. The base case model was then designed in IES VE software, and the construction materials and profiles were made to conform to the standard regulations and guidelines of Nigeria. The base model was subjected to two different scenarios (Traditional building envelope and thermal insulation of Modern building envelope) and the results of the simulation were analysed and compared to the actual energy consumption using ASHRAE 2014 standard guidelines. A sensitivity analysis was carried out using visual PROMETHEE II software to ascertain the robustness and stability of the results. The results of the study show that an average of 9– 10 h of electricity is supplied to residential buildings per day. Additionally, the base case building’s actual and simulated electricity consumption is 10.43 kWh/m2 year and 45.1 kWh/m2 year respectively and cooling load accounts for 35.6% (14.5 kWh/m2 year) of the total annual energy consumption of the building. There was a reduction in annual electricity consumption and cooling load by 20.4% (35.9 kWh/m2 year) and 36.6% (9.2 kWh/m2 year) respectively when the use of a traditional building envelope (strategy 1) was adopted. Similarly, the adoption of thermal insulation of the modern building envelope (strategy 2) leads to a reduction in annual energy consumption and cooling load by 21.3% (35.5 kWh/m2 year) and 47.6% (7.6 kWh/m2 year) respectively. Strategy 2 performed better when compared to the base model and strategy 1 as 50% of the months achieved a PPD of less than 15%. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis result shows the use of thermal insulation in the modern building envelope (strategy 2) is the best compared to the traditional building envelope (strategy 1). The adoption of any of these approaches in the design of residential buildings in Nigeria can not only lead to comfortable indoor environments and energy savings associated with cooling but can also cause a reduction in Open Access Received: 28 February 2023 Accepted: 10 May 2023 Published: 19 May 2023 Copyright © 2023 by the author(s). Licensee Hapres, London, United Kingdom. This is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Journal of Sustainability Research 2 of 46 carbon-dioxide emissions by 23.2% and 28.4% when strategy 1 or 2 is used respectively and cost of electricity savings by 20.4% and 25.7% when strategy 1 or 2 is adopted respectively.","PeriodicalId":275909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainability Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20230007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigates different passive design measures to improve residential buildings’ energy efficiency and mitigate the effects of climate change. To identify the best passive design strategy for the climate under study, a four-Bedroom one-storey modern residential building for singlefamily was picked within the hot-dry climate zone of Nigeria as a case study. A questionnaire survey was adopted to ascertain the thermophysical properties of the building envelope, energy consumption by taking meter readings, occupancy behaviour and electricity supply schedule. The base case model was then designed in IES VE software, and the construction materials and profiles were made to conform to the standard regulations and guidelines of Nigeria. The base model was subjected to two different scenarios (Traditional building envelope and thermal insulation of Modern building envelope) and the results of the simulation were analysed and compared to the actual energy consumption using ASHRAE 2014 standard guidelines. A sensitivity analysis was carried out using visual PROMETHEE II software to ascertain the robustness and stability of the results. The results of the study show that an average of 9– 10 h of electricity is supplied to residential buildings per day. Additionally, the base case building’s actual and simulated electricity consumption is 10.43 kWh/m2 year and 45.1 kWh/m2 year respectively and cooling load accounts for 35.6% (14.5 kWh/m2 year) of the total annual energy consumption of the building. There was a reduction in annual electricity consumption and cooling load by 20.4% (35.9 kWh/m2 year) and 36.6% (9.2 kWh/m2 year) respectively when the use of a traditional building envelope (strategy 1) was adopted. Similarly, the adoption of thermal insulation of the modern building envelope (strategy 2) leads to a reduction in annual energy consumption and cooling load by 21.3% (35.5 kWh/m2 year) and 47.6% (7.6 kWh/m2 year) respectively. Strategy 2 performed better when compared to the base model and strategy 1 as 50% of the months achieved a PPD of less than 15%. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis result shows the use of thermal insulation in the modern building envelope (strategy 2) is the best compared to the traditional building envelope (strategy 1). The adoption of any of these approaches in the design of residential buildings in Nigeria can not only lead to comfortable indoor environments and energy savings associated with cooling but can also cause a reduction in Open Access Received: 28 February 2023 Accepted: 10 May 2023 Published: 19 May 2023 Copyright © 2023 by the author(s). Licensee Hapres, London, United Kingdom. This is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Journal of Sustainability Research 2 of 46 carbon-dioxide emissions by 23.2% and 28.4% when strategy 1 or 2 is used respectively and cost of electricity savings by 20.4% and 25.7% when strategy 1 or 2 is adopted respectively.
结合建筑仿真与敏感性分析评价尼日利亚住宅被动式设计方法
本研究探讨了不同的被动式设计措施,以提高住宅建筑的能源效率和减轻气候变化的影响。为了确定研究中气候的最佳被动式设计策略,在尼日利亚干热气候区选择了一栋四居室单层单户现代住宅作为案例研究。采用问卷调查的方式来确定建筑围护结构的热物理特性、通过抄表读数的能源消耗、使用行为和供电时间表。然后在IES VE软件中设计基本案例模型,并根据尼日利亚的标准法规和指导方针制作建筑材料和型材。采用传统建筑围护结构和现代建筑围护结构的隔热两种不同情景,对基本模型进行了分析,并将模拟结果与ASHRAE 2014标准指南的实际能耗进行了比较。采用PROMETHEE II可视化软件进行敏感性分析,以确定结果的稳健性和稳定性。研究结果表明,平均每天9 - 10小时的电力供应给住宅建筑。基础案例建筑实际用电量为10.43 kWh/m2年,模拟用电量为45.1 kWh/m2年,冷负荷占建筑年总能耗的35.6% (14.5 kWh/m2年)。当采用传统建筑围护结构(策略一)时,每年的用电量和冷负荷分别减少20.4%(35.9千瓦时/平方米年)和36.6%(9.2千瓦时/平方米年)。同样,采用现代建筑围护结构的隔热(策略2),每年的能耗和冷负荷分别减少21.3%(35.5千瓦时/平方米年)和47.6%(7.6千瓦时/平方米年)。与基本模型和策略1相比,策略2的表现更好,50%的月份实现了低于15%的PPD。此外,敏感性分析结果显示,与传统建筑围护结构(策略1)相比,在现代建筑围护结构(策略2)中使用隔热材料是最好的。在尼日利亚的住宅建筑设计中采用任何这些方法不仅可以带来舒适的室内环境和与冷却相关的节能,而且还可以减少开放访问。版权所有©2023由作者(s)。被许可方Hapres,伦敦,英国。这是一篇在知识共享署名4.0国际许可条款和条件下发布的开放获取文章。可持续发展研究杂志2的46二氧化碳排放量分别23.2%和28.4%,当采用策略1或2分别节省电力成本20.4%和25.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信