Evidence Synthesis Methods

S. Springs, Jay M. Baruch
{"title":"Evidence Synthesis Methods","authors":"S. Springs, Jay M. Baruch","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780190918514.003.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the many studies that are published every day by research teams across the globe, decisions in healthcare policy, practice, and programming are often made in the absence of quality, relevant evidence. This evidence gap between research and practice highlights the need to improve translation of what is known into what is done. Evidence synthesis employs rigorous and replicable techniques to bridge this gap, to better understand the quality and quantity of relevant evidence that informs decision making. In this chapter, the authors provide an overview of evidence synthesis in health humanities and describe the necessary process steps to conduct evidence synthesis projects in a rigorous and reproducible manner. This chapter intends to provide readers with the requisite knowledge to become informed consumers of evidence synthesis products and familiar with the basic steps necessary to complete an evidence review.","PeriodicalId":377009,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Health Humanities","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Health Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780190918514.003.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the many studies that are published every day by research teams across the globe, decisions in healthcare policy, practice, and programming are often made in the absence of quality, relevant evidence. This evidence gap between research and practice highlights the need to improve translation of what is known into what is done. Evidence synthesis employs rigorous and replicable techniques to bridge this gap, to better understand the quality and quantity of relevant evidence that informs decision making. In this chapter, the authors provide an overview of evidence synthesis in health humanities and describe the necessary process steps to conduct evidence synthesis projects in a rigorous and reproducible manner. This chapter intends to provide readers with the requisite knowledge to become informed consumers of evidence synthesis products and familiar with the basic steps necessary to complete an evidence review.
证据合成方法
尽管全球各地的研究团队每天都会发表许多研究,但医疗保健政策、实践和规划方面的决策往往是在缺乏高质量、相关证据的情况下做出的。研究与实践之间的证据差距突出表明,需要改进将已知知识转化为实际行动的工作。证据合成采用严格和可复制的技术来弥补这一差距,以便更好地了解为决策提供信息的相关证据的质量和数量。在本章中,作者概述了健康人文学科的证据合成,并描述了以严格和可重复的方式进行证据合成项目的必要过程步骤。本章旨在为读者提供必要的知识,成为证据合成产品的知情消费者,并熟悉完成证据审查所需的基本步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信