Porównanie progów słyszenia wyznaczonych za pomocą różnych aplikacji na telefony komórkowe

Instytut Fizjologii, Patologii Słuchu, Badań Przesiewowych, Rehabilitacji Kardiologicznej, Instytut Narządów Zmysłów, Kajetany
{"title":"Porównanie progów słyszenia wyznaczonych za pomocą różnych aplikacji na telefony komórkowe","authors":"Instytut Fizjologii, Patologii Słuchu, Badań Przesiewowych, Rehabilitacji Kardiologicznej, Instytut Narządów Zmysłów, Kajetany","doi":"10.17431/11.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hearing defect is the most common damage of the sensory organs. Over 1.5 billion people suffer from hearing loss in the world. A lot of them live in the areas where there is no access to audiological care and appropriate tests. Late diagnosis or lack of treatment can lead to serious consequences, that’s why it is so important to implement prophylaxis and hearing screening tests. Thanks to the development of technology, a good alternative to audiometric tests, performed on professional devices, are mobile phones. There are different smartphone apps developed to check the condition of hearing, to spread awareness about hearing loss and the necessity for early diagnosis, diagnosis and audiological therapy. in terms of usability in hearing tests in adults and to define the accuracy of determination of hearing thresholds using a smartphone app compared to a Senses Examination Platform. Material and methods: A comparative test was conducted in a group of 21 people aged 24 to 63 years old. Hearing thresholds were determined with Senses Examination Platform and three applications: Tester Słuchu, Badanie Słuchu and Hearing Test. Results: The analysis of the research results showed that mobile phone applications gave the similar results to those obtained using the Senses Examination Platform. The closest results were produced with the Badanie Słuchu application. For all frequencies the percentage of differences between the programs, determined using the application and the audiometer – Platform Sensory Research, exceeded 90%. An equally good result was obtained with the application Hearing Test. The worst results were produced with the Tester Słuchu app which showed the lowest match with the results obtained with the Senses Examination Platform, especially for a frequency of 250 Hz. Conclusions: The conducted research has shown that the tested applications can be used as a hearing screening tool, and the results obtained with the application in most cases coincide with the results obtained with the Senses Examination Platform.","PeriodicalId":214555,"journal":{"name":"Nowa Audiofonologia","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nowa Audiofonologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17431/11.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hearing defect is the most common damage of the sensory organs. Over 1.5 billion people suffer from hearing loss in the world. A lot of them live in the areas where there is no access to audiological care and appropriate tests. Late diagnosis or lack of treatment can lead to serious consequences, that’s why it is so important to implement prophylaxis and hearing screening tests. Thanks to the development of technology, a good alternative to audiometric tests, performed on professional devices, are mobile phones. There are different smartphone apps developed to check the condition of hearing, to spread awareness about hearing loss and the necessity for early diagnosis, diagnosis and audiological therapy. in terms of usability in hearing tests in adults and to define the accuracy of determination of hearing thresholds using a smartphone app compared to a Senses Examination Platform. Material and methods: A comparative test was conducted in a group of 21 people aged 24 to 63 years old. Hearing thresholds were determined with Senses Examination Platform and three applications: Tester Słuchu, Badanie Słuchu and Hearing Test. Results: The analysis of the research results showed that mobile phone applications gave the similar results to those obtained using the Senses Examination Platform. The closest results were produced with the Badanie Słuchu application. For all frequencies the percentage of differences between the programs, determined using the application and the audiometer – Platform Sensory Research, exceeded 90%. An equally good result was obtained with the application Hearing Test. The worst results were produced with the Tester Słuchu app which showed the lowest match with the results obtained with the Senses Examination Platform, especially for a frequency of 250 Hz. Conclusions: The conducted research has shown that the tested applications can be used as a hearing screening tool, and the results obtained with the application in most cases coincide with the results obtained with the Senses Examination Platform.
听力缺陷是最常见的感觉器官损伤。世界上有超过15亿人患有听力损失。他们中的许多人生活在无法获得听力学护理和适当测试的地区。诊断晚或缺乏治疗可能导致严重后果,这就是实施预防和听力筛查测试如此重要的原因。由于技术的发展,在专业设备上进行听力测试的一个很好的替代品是手机。人们开发了不同的智能手机应用程序来检查听力状况,传播有关听力损失的意识,以及早期诊断、诊断和听力学治疗的必要性。在成人听力测试的可用性方面,以及与感官检查平台相比,使用智能手机应用程序确定听力阈值的准确性。材料与方法:对年龄在24 ~ 63岁的21人进行对比试验。使用感官检测平台和三种应用程序:Tester Słuchu、Badanie Słuchu和Hearing Test来确定听力阈值。结果:对研究结果的分析表明,手机应用程序给出的结果与使用感官检查平台获得的结果相似。最接近的结果是使用Badanie Słuchu应用程序产生的。对于所有频率,使用应用程序和听力计-平台感官研究确定的节目之间的差异百分比超过90%。应用听力测试获得了同样好的结果。最糟糕的结果是使用Tester Słuchu应用程序产生的,该应用程序显示与感官检查平台获得的结果匹配度最低,特别是在250 Hz的频率下。结论:本研究表明,所测试的应用程序可以作为听力筛查工具,并且大多数情况下应用程序获得的结果与感官检查平台获得的结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信