A comparison of three methods for the quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from spontaneous combustion in open-cut coal mines

W. Lilley, Stuart J Day, David J. Williams, M. Rae, J. Carras
{"title":"A comparison of three methods for the quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from spontaneous combustion in open-cut coal mines","authors":"W. Lilley, Stuart J Day, David J. Williams, M. Rae, J. Carras","doi":"10.1080/20430779.2012.724951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Greenhouse gas emissions from spontaneous combustion in coal mines are currently excluded from national inventories by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change because there are no robust methods available to quantify the emissions. This article reports on investigations of three approaches being pursued with the aim of developing methods which are sufficiently robust to enable these emissions to be included in inventories. The first method was based on the use of airborne thermal infrared photography coupled with chamber measurements of emissions from hot mine spoil pile surfaces. In the second method, crosswind traverses of the plume using an instrumented vehicle were used to estimate the emission fluxes. The third method was based on inverse atmospheric modelling using stationary CO2 monitors. All three methods showed considerable scatter in their estimates but also showed appreciable overlap. While the three methods used in this study have shown convergence, there is still considerable uncertainty associated with any single approach.","PeriodicalId":411329,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2012.724951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions from spontaneous combustion in coal mines are currently excluded from national inventories by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change because there are no robust methods available to quantify the emissions. This article reports on investigations of three approaches being pursued with the aim of developing methods which are sufficiently robust to enable these emissions to be included in inventories. The first method was based on the use of airborne thermal infrared photography coupled with chamber measurements of emissions from hot mine spoil pile surfaces. In the second method, crosswind traverses of the plume using an instrumented vehicle were used to estimate the emission fluxes. The third method was based on inverse atmospheric modelling using stationary CO2 monitors. All three methods showed considerable scatter in their estimates but also showed appreciable overlap. While the three methods used in this study have shown convergence, there is still considerable uncertainty associated with any single approach.
露天矿自燃温室气体排放三种量化方法的比较
《联合国气候变化框架公约》目前将煤矿自燃产生的温室气体排放排除在国家清单之外,因为没有可靠的方法来量化排放。本文报告了对正在进行的三种方法的调查,目的是制定足够可靠的方法,使这些排放能够列入清单。第一种方法是基于使用机载热红外摄影加上热矿矸石堆表面排放的室内测量。在第二种方法中,使用仪器载具对羽流进行侧风穿越来估计排放通量。第三种方法是基于使用固定二氧化碳监测器的逆大气模型。这三种方法在其估计中显示出相当大的分散,但也显示出明显的重叠。虽然本研究中使用的三种方法显示出收敛性,但任何一种方法仍然存在相当大的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信