Comparison of common wheat and spelt by total lipids and fatty acid levels

36 Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI:10.26565/2075-5457-2021-36-10
L. Relina, O. Suprun, R. Bohuslavskyi, L. Vecherska, O. Leonov, O. Antsyferova, O. Golik
{"title":"Comparison of common wheat and spelt by total lipids and fatty acid levels","authors":"L. Relina, O. Suprun, R. Bohuslavskyi, L. Vecherska, O. Leonov, O. Antsyferova, O. Golik","doi":"10.26565/2075-5457-2021-36-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays the interest of breeders, producers and consumers is going back to ancient wheat species, such as Triticum spelta, which are often considered as more valuable for healthy nutrition. In this light, we compared spelt cultivars and breeding lines with commercial common wheat cultivars by total lipid content, fatty acid levels and unsaturated/saturated ratio in grain. Lipids were extracted by Soxhlet procedure. Fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatography. On average, the total lipid content was higher in the spelt cultivars than in the breeding spelt lines (3.04±0.24 % vs. 2.23±0.69 %, p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the average content of total lipids in the spelt cultivars, but not the breeding spelt lines, and the common wheat cultivars (3.04±0.24 % vs. 2.44±0.57 %, p < 0.05). Six major fatty acids were found in hexaploid wheat species, with linoleic acid being the most abundant. They are ranked in order of decreasing levels as follows: linoleic > oleic >palmitic > linolenic > stearic > palmitoleic. We also detected trace amounts of 3 minor fatty acids: eicosanoic (arachidic), eicosenoic and behenic acids. Common wheat is not inferior to spelt in terms of unsaturated fatty acid levels, because the ratios of unsaturated acids to saturated ones in grain of T. spelta accessions were similar to those in commercial common wheat cultivars. The oleic acid content was higher in spelt accessions; though the linoleic acid content was higher in T. aestivum cultivars. Spring common wheat cultivar Heroinia had the most beneficial unsaturated/saturated ratio of 4.5. We detected no differences in unsaturated acid amounts between spring and winter hexaploid wheats. We observed no patterns in variability of fatty acid contents across the accessions under investigation, because the same accession can be characterized by a wide variability in one fatty acid and by a narrow range for another, and, at the same time, the same fatty acid can be very variable within one accession and little variable in another. There were no significant differences in the total lipid content and fatty acid levels between the study years for the same accession.","PeriodicalId":166012,"journal":{"name":"36","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"36","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-5457-2021-36-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays the interest of breeders, producers and consumers is going back to ancient wheat species, such as Triticum spelta, which are often considered as more valuable for healthy nutrition. In this light, we compared spelt cultivars and breeding lines with commercial common wheat cultivars by total lipid content, fatty acid levels and unsaturated/saturated ratio in grain. Lipids were extracted by Soxhlet procedure. Fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatography. On average, the total lipid content was higher in the spelt cultivars than in the breeding spelt lines (3.04±0.24 % vs. 2.23±0.69 %, p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the average content of total lipids in the spelt cultivars, but not the breeding spelt lines, and the common wheat cultivars (3.04±0.24 % vs. 2.44±0.57 %, p < 0.05). Six major fatty acids were found in hexaploid wheat species, with linoleic acid being the most abundant. They are ranked in order of decreasing levels as follows: linoleic > oleic >palmitic > linolenic > stearic > palmitoleic. We also detected trace amounts of 3 minor fatty acids: eicosanoic (arachidic), eicosenoic and behenic acids. Common wheat is not inferior to spelt in terms of unsaturated fatty acid levels, because the ratios of unsaturated acids to saturated ones in grain of T. spelta accessions were similar to those in commercial common wheat cultivars. The oleic acid content was higher in spelt accessions; though the linoleic acid content was higher in T. aestivum cultivars. Spring common wheat cultivar Heroinia had the most beneficial unsaturated/saturated ratio of 4.5. We detected no differences in unsaturated acid amounts between spring and winter hexaploid wheats. We observed no patterns in variability of fatty acid contents across the accessions under investigation, because the same accession can be characterized by a wide variability in one fatty acid and by a narrow range for another, and, at the same time, the same fatty acid can be very variable within one accession and little variable in another. There were no significant differences in the total lipid content and fatty acid levels between the study years for the same accession.
普通小麦和斯佩尔特小麦总脂质和脂肪酸水平的比较
如今,育种者、生产者和消费者的兴趣又回到了古老的小麦品种,如小麦,它们通常被认为对健康营养更有价值。为此,我们比较了斯佩尔特小麦品种和选品系与商品普通小麦品种籽粒总脂肪含量、脂肪酸水平和不饱和/饱和比。用索氏法提取脂质。用气相色谱法测定脂肪酸组成。斯佩尔特品种的总脂肪含量平均高于选育斯佩尔特品系(3.04±0.24%比2.23±0.69%,p < 0.05)。小麦品种间总脂质平均含量差异显著(3.04±0.24% vs. 2.44±0.57%,p < 0.05),而选育品系间差异不显著。在六倍体小麦中发现了6种主要脂肪酸,其中亚油酸含量最多。其含量递减顺序为:亚油酸>油酸>棕榈酸>亚麻酸>硬脂酸>棕榈油酸。我们还检测到微量的3种微量脂肪酸:二十烷酸(花生酸)、二十烷酸和白果酸。普通小麦的不饱和脂肪酸含量并不低于斯佩尔特小麦,因为斯佩尔特小麦品种籽粒中不饱和脂肪酸与饱和脂肪酸的比值与商品普通小麦品种相似。拼法品种油酸含量较高;亚油酸含量在不同品种中较高。春小麦品种Heroinia最有利的不饱和/饱和比为4.5。我们发现春小麦和冬小麦在不饱和酸含量上没有差异。我们没有观察到不同品种间脂肪酸含量的变化规律,这是因为同一品种中,一种脂肪酸的变化幅度较大,而另一种脂肪酸的变化幅度较小;同时,同一种脂肪酸在一个品种中变化很大,在另一个品种中变化很小。研究年份间总脂质含量和脂肪酸水平无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
36
36
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信