A legal Review of the Extinction of Political Parties: Focusing on the Registration and Cancellation of Political Parties Registration

Hyun Jai Kim
{"title":"A legal Review of the Extinction of Political Parties: Focusing on the Registration and Cancellation of Political Parties Registration","authors":"Hyun Jai Kim","doi":"10.38133/cnulawreview.2022.42.4.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political parties need to be distinguished from general political associations or social organizations. However, the Constitution does not have explicit regulations on the concept of political parties. Any political party can be said to be a formal concept with only two elements as conceptual signs: participating in the formation of the people's political will such as elections and having a voluntary organization of the people. Article 8 (1) of the Constitution guarantees the freedom to establish political parties and a multi-party system, and the Party Act should contain content that realizes and embodies such freedom, but on the contrary, it should not contain content that controls and suppresses such freedom. In light of the fact that both authoritarianism and authoritarianism can be recognized under the law, the registration system itself, which requires the National Election Commission to register as the competent authority by examining only formal requirements for organizations with substantive requirements as parties under the party law, cannot be considered unconstitutional. However, demanding more than 5 cities and provinces and more than 1,000 members as legal requirements for registration of political parties is an excessive restriction and burden on new or small parties compared to existing large parties. According to the Political Parties Act, just before the revision of the Political Parties Act in 2004, the district party required only 1/10 of the local constituencies and the number of members of more than 30 per district, so the total number of party members was only 720. However, with the revision of the Political Parties Act in 2004, a total of more than 5,000 party members are now needed, which can be evaluated as a reform, not an improvement. Furthermore, due to the requirements of more than five districts under the Political Parties Act, it is difficult to establish regional political parties at the small and medium-sized regional level that can be closer to the metropolitan area, so it needs to be revised. The reason for cancellation of party registration also needs to be improved within a short period of four years. In addition, the cancellation of registration due to the weak results of participating in the election leads to the abandonment of participation in the parliamentary election itself due to concerns over the cancellation of registration in the case of new and minor parties. And by depriving the public of the opportunity to grow into a more solid political party in the process of continuing party activities, there is a concern that it will block the political cohesion of minority opinions and undermine political diversity and openness of the political activities. Therefore, it is necessary to simply completely abolish it according to the decision of the Constitutional Court. Furthermore, it would be reasonable to allow the party to hold the remaining property due to the cancellation of registration in case the party reacquires the registration requirements in the future, rather than forcing it collectively by law.","PeriodicalId":288398,"journal":{"name":"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38133/cnulawreview.2022.42.4.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political parties need to be distinguished from general political associations or social organizations. However, the Constitution does not have explicit regulations on the concept of political parties. Any political party can be said to be a formal concept with only two elements as conceptual signs: participating in the formation of the people's political will such as elections and having a voluntary organization of the people. Article 8 (1) of the Constitution guarantees the freedom to establish political parties and a multi-party system, and the Party Act should contain content that realizes and embodies such freedom, but on the contrary, it should not contain content that controls and suppresses such freedom. In light of the fact that both authoritarianism and authoritarianism can be recognized under the law, the registration system itself, which requires the National Election Commission to register as the competent authority by examining only formal requirements for organizations with substantive requirements as parties under the party law, cannot be considered unconstitutional. However, demanding more than 5 cities and provinces and more than 1,000 members as legal requirements for registration of political parties is an excessive restriction and burden on new or small parties compared to existing large parties. According to the Political Parties Act, just before the revision of the Political Parties Act in 2004, the district party required only 1/10 of the local constituencies and the number of members of more than 30 per district, so the total number of party members was only 720. However, with the revision of the Political Parties Act in 2004, a total of more than 5,000 party members are now needed, which can be evaluated as a reform, not an improvement. Furthermore, due to the requirements of more than five districts under the Political Parties Act, it is difficult to establish regional political parties at the small and medium-sized regional level that can be closer to the metropolitan area, so it needs to be revised. The reason for cancellation of party registration also needs to be improved within a short period of four years. In addition, the cancellation of registration due to the weak results of participating in the election leads to the abandonment of participation in the parliamentary election itself due to concerns over the cancellation of registration in the case of new and minor parties. And by depriving the public of the opportunity to grow into a more solid political party in the process of continuing party activities, there is a concern that it will block the political cohesion of minority opinions and undermine political diversity and openness of the political activities. Therefore, it is necessary to simply completely abolish it according to the decision of the Constitutional Court. Furthermore, it would be reasonable to allow the party to hold the remaining property due to the cancellation of registration in case the party reacquires the registration requirements in the future, rather than forcing it collectively by law.
政党消亡的法律审视——以政党登记与注销为中心
政党必须区别于一般的政治团体或社会组织。但是,《宪法》并没有明确规定政党的概念。任何政党都可以说是一个形式概念,只有两个要素作为概念标志:参与人民政治意志的形成,如选举和具有人民自愿组织。宪法第8条第1款保障了建立政党和多党制的自由,党党法应包含实现和体现这种自由的内容,而不应包含控制和压制这种自由的内容。根据《党法》,权威主义和权威主义都是可以被承认的,因此,对具有政党资格的团体,只对形式上的要求进行审查,就要求中央选举管理委员会登记为主管机关的登记制度本身不能被认为是违宪的。但是,与现有的大党相比,将5个市道以上和1000名以上党员作为政党登记的法定条件,对新政党和小党来说是过度的限制和负担。根据《政党法》,在2004年修改《政党法》之前,地区党只需要十分之一的选区和30名以上的地区党员,所以党员总数只有720人。但是,随着2004年修改《政党法》,现在需要5000多名党员,这与其说是改善,不如说是改革。另外,根据《政党法》的规定,5个以上的地区是很难在离首都圈更近的中小地区设立地区政党的,因此有必要进行修改。取消政党登记的理由也需要在短短的4年内得到改善。此外,由于参加选举的结果不佳而取消登记,导致对新政党和小政党取消登记的担忧而放弃参加议会选举本身。有人担心,在政党活动持续进行的过程中,剥夺国民成长为坚实政党的机会,会阻碍少数意见的政治凝聚力,破坏政治活动的多样性和开放性。因此,有必要根据宪法裁判所的判决彻底废除该制度。”此外,允许当事人保留因注销登记而遗留下来的财产是合理的,以备当事人将来再次要求登记时使用,而不是通过法律集体强制使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信