Dynamic driving task fallback for an automated driving system whose ability to monitor the driving environment has been compromised

Yrvann Emzivat, J. Guzman, P. Martinet, O. Roux
{"title":"Dynamic driving task fallback for an automated driving system whose ability to monitor the driving environment has been compromised","authors":"Yrvann Emzivat, J. Guzman, P. Martinet, O. Roux","doi":"10.1109/IVS.2017.7995973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An Automated Driving System (ADS) is subject to hazardous weather conditions and to failures, both of which can result in a partial or total loss of its ability to monitor the driving environment. Yet until high driving automation and full driving automation is achieved, a human driver is expected to respond appropriately to any malfunction or adverse on-road conditions preventing the ADS from reliably sustaining the dynamic driving task performance. However, automation causes drowsiness and hypo-vigilance, which can compromise a human driver's ability to respond to ADS-issued requests. Hence the necessity of defining dynamic driving task fallback strategies that can be performed by the ADS, if and when necessary. The proposed fallback strategy is aimed at level 4 ADS features designed to operate a vehicle on a road whose characteristics make any attempt at stopping hazardous. It naturally applies to level 5 ADS-operated vehicles and to ADS-dedicated vehicles as well. The transition stage, during which the strategy is triggered, consists in the replacement of missing vehicles and obstacles in the world model with ghost objects. An embedded visibility map is then used to retrieve the maximum distance at which the ADS-operated vehicle can be seen, when driving behind it. The speed profile underlying the fallback strategy meets a time to collision criterion of 4 s, which enables the avoidance and the mitigation of rear-end collisions. The behaviour of drivers in collision imminent situations cannot be observed in test track studies due to safety concerns. As a result, experiments were conducted in the driving simulation software SCANeR studio.","PeriodicalId":143367,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

An Automated Driving System (ADS) is subject to hazardous weather conditions and to failures, both of which can result in a partial or total loss of its ability to monitor the driving environment. Yet until high driving automation and full driving automation is achieved, a human driver is expected to respond appropriately to any malfunction or adverse on-road conditions preventing the ADS from reliably sustaining the dynamic driving task performance. However, automation causes drowsiness and hypo-vigilance, which can compromise a human driver's ability to respond to ADS-issued requests. Hence the necessity of defining dynamic driving task fallback strategies that can be performed by the ADS, if and when necessary. The proposed fallback strategy is aimed at level 4 ADS features designed to operate a vehicle on a road whose characteristics make any attempt at stopping hazardous. It naturally applies to level 5 ADS-operated vehicles and to ADS-dedicated vehicles as well. The transition stage, during which the strategy is triggered, consists in the replacement of missing vehicles and obstacles in the world model with ghost objects. An embedded visibility map is then used to retrieve the maximum distance at which the ADS-operated vehicle can be seen, when driving behind it. The speed profile underlying the fallback strategy meets a time to collision criterion of 4 s, which enables the avoidance and the mitigation of rear-end collisions. The behaviour of drivers in collision imminent situations cannot be observed in test track studies due to safety concerns. As a result, experiments were conducted in the driving simulation software SCANeR studio.
自动驾驶系统监测驾驶环境的能力受到损害时的动态驾驶任务后退
自动驾驶系统(ADS)会受到恶劣天气条件和故障的影响,这两种情况都可能导致其部分或全部丧失监控驾驶环境的能力。然而,在实现高度驾驶自动化和完全驾驶自动化之前,人类驾驶员需要对任何阻碍ADS可靠地维持动态驾驶任务性能的故障或不利路况做出适当的反应。然而,自动驾驶会导致嗜睡和警惕性低下,这可能会影响人类驾驶员对ads发出的请求做出反应的能力。因此,有必要定义动态驱动任务回退策略,以便在必要时由ADS执行。拟议的后备策略针对的是4级ADS功能,该功能旨在让车辆在任何试图停止危险的道路上行驶。它当然适用于5级ads操作车辆和ads专用车辆。在过渡阶段,策略被触发,包括用幽灵物体替换世界模型中丢失的车辆和障碍物。然后,使用嵌入式能见度地图来检索ads操作的车辆在其后面行驶时可以看到的最大距离。后退策略的速度曲线满足4 s的碰撞时间标准,从而能够避免和减轻追尾碰撞。由于安全考虑,在测试轨道研究中无法观察到驾驶员在即将发生碰撞情况下的行为。因此,在驾驶仿真软件SCANeR studio中进行了实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信