Power analysis of high throughput pipelined carry-propagation adders

A. Åslund, O. Gustafsson, H. OhIsson, L. Wanhammar
{"title":"Power analysis of high throughput pipelined carry-propagation adders","authors":"A. Åslund, O. Gustafsson, H. OhIsson, L. Wanhammar","doi":"10.1109/NORCHP.2004.1423842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In several previous papers the area, delay, and power consumption for various carry-propagation adders have been compared. However, for high throughput applications it may be necessary to introduce pipelining into the adder. The number of stages to be inserted and the width of the pipelining registers differs between different adders structure. In this work we focus on the power consumption far adder structures when pipelining is used to increase the throughput. Four adder structures with varying wordlengths and pipeline levels are implemented using standard cells and the power consumption is compared. The results show that the Kogge-Stone parallel Prefix adder gives the lowest power consumption given the throughput most of the time.","PeriodicalId":208182,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Norchip Conference, 2004.","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Norchip Conference, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NORCHP.2004.1423842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In several previous papers the area, delay, and power consumption for various carry-propagation adders have been compared. However, for high throughput applications it may be necessary to introduce pipelining into the adder. The number of stages to be inserted and the width of the pipelining registers differs between different adders structure. In this work we focus on the power consumption far adder structures when pipelining is used to increase the throughput. Four adder structures with varying wordlengths and pipeline levels are implemented using standard cells and the power consumption is compared. The results show that the Kogge-Stone parallel Prefix adder gives the lowest power consumption given the throughput most of the time.
高通量流水载波传输加法器的功率分析
在以前的几篇论文中,对各种载波传播加法器的面积、延迟和功耗进行了比较。然而,对于高吞吐量的应用,可能有必要在加法器中引入流水线。要插入的级数和流水线寄存器的宽度在不同加法器结构之间是不同的。在本工作中,我们重点研究了当使用流水线来提高吞吐量时,加法器结构的功耗。采用标准单元实现了具有不同字长和管道级别的四种加法器结构,并对其功耗进行了比较。结果表明,在大多数情况下,在给定吞吐量的情况下,Kogge-Stone并行前缀加法器的功耗最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信