The King of the Persepolis Tablets the Nineteenth Year of Artaxerxes I

A. Poebel
{"title":"The King of the Persepolis Tablets the Nineteenth Year of Artaxerxes I","authors":"A. Poebel","doi":"10.1086/370548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"only mention in Josephus of any Persian king between Artaxerxes I Longimanus and Darius III Codomannus, it is altogether probable that his \"general\" was the celebrated officer of Artaxerxes III and that he confused him with the one who opposed Johanan, entered the temple, and imposed the severe fine on the Jews. In the time previous to the find of the letters from Yeb it had naturally been customary to identify the Bagoas of Antt. xi. 7. 1 with the arpaTr'ybs of Ochus, but the new evidence has changed the situation. I can see no reason for believing that the Bagahi of the Elephantine correspondence and of the Johanan-Jeshua tragedy was in Judea at all in the time of Artaxerxes II.","PeriodicalId":252942,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1939-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/370548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

only mention in Josephus of any Persian king between Artaxerxes I Longimanus and Darius III Codomannus, it is altogether probable that his "general" was the celebrated officer of Artaxerxes III and that he confused him with the one who opposed Johanan, entered the temple, and imposed the severe fine on the Jews. In the time previous to the find of the letters from Yeb it had naturally been customary to identify the Bagoas of Antt. xi. 7. 1 with the arpaTr'ybs of Ochus, but the new evidence has changed the situation. I can see no reason for believing that the Bagahi of the Elephantine correspondence and of the Johanan-Jeshua tragedy was in Judea at all in the time of Artaxerxes II.
波斯波利斯石碑之王,亚达薛西一世十九年
只有在约瑟夫提到任何波斯国王之间的亚达薛西一世隆基马努斯和大流士三世科多曼努斯,这是完全可能的,他的“将军”是著名的军官亚达薛西三世,他混淆了他与一个反对约哈南,进入寺庙,并对犹太人实行严厉的罚款。在发现耶布的信件之前,人们自然习惯于辨认安特的巴戈阿。西7. 但新的证据改变了这种情况。我看不出有任何理由相信,在亚达薛西二世时期,象岛书信和约哈南-耶书亚悲剧中的巴加希在犹太。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信