Geschichtsdidaktische Perspektive auf die 'Vormoderne'

Sebastian Barsch
{"title":"Geschichtsdidaktische Perspektive auf die 'Vormoderne'","authors":"Sebastian Barsch","doi":"10.38072/2703-0784/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Current research shows the importance of interaction between content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for history teachers. This is considered effective for the design of history lessons. \n But even beyond these practical implications, the question of the relationship between historical studies and history education is of great importance. Both approaches have a common object: the past. \n However, the methodically approaches to the past follow different ways. While historical scholarship reconstructs the past by using sources, history education is dedicated to the reception of history.\n A dialogue between these two approaches can expand the boundaries of both disciplines with new insights. The anthology is dedicated to such an interlocking of historical research and history education \n using the example of pre-modern history. In the essays, perspectives opened up by scholars are supplemented by comments from history educators. Thus, on the one hand, it is reflected how subject-specific \n research could enrich teaching in schools and universities. In addition, these findings are classified in terms of historical theory and empirics.\n","PeriodicalId":298566,"journal":{"name":"Think! Historically","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Think! Historically","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38072/2703-0784/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current research shows the importance of interaction between content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for history teachers. This is considered effective for the design of history lessons. But even beyond these practical implications, the question of the relationship between historical studies and history education is of great importance. Both approaches have a common object: the past. However, the methodically approaches to the past follow different ways. While historical scholarship reconstructs the past by using sources, history education is dedicated to the reception of history. A dialogue between these two approaches can expand the boundaries of both disciplines with new insights. The anthology is dedicated to such an interlocking of historical research and history education using the example of pre-modern history. In the essays, perspectives opened up by scholars are supplemented by comments from history educators. Thus, on the one hand, it is reflected how subject-specific research could enrich teaching in schools and universities. In addition, these findings are classified in terms of historical theory and empirics.
教学的“前现代”知识
当前的研究表明,内容知识与教学内容知识的互动对于历史教师的重要性。这被认为是历史课程设计的有效方法。但是,除了这些实际意义之外,历史研究与历史教育的关系问题也非常重要。这两种方法都有一个共同的对象:过去。然而,对过去的系统方法遵循不同的方式。历史学术通过资料重建过去,而历史教育致力于历史的接受。这两种方法之间的对话可以用新的见解扩展这两个学科的边界。这本选集以前现代史为例,致力于历史研究和历史教育的相互联系。在文章中,学者们的观点被历史教育者的评论所补充。因此,一方面,它反映了学科研究如何丰富学校和大学的教学。此外,这些研究结果从历史理论和实证两方面进行了分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信