Exploring the instructions and evaluation methods for improving creative thinking competency

Jae-Hyuk Jang
{"title":"Exploring the instructions and evaluation methods for improving creative thinking competency","authors":"Jae-Hyuk Jang","doi":"10.36358/jce.2022.22.2.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purposes of this study were confirmed the student's creative thinking competency profile and the instructions and evaluation methods that affect the profile. LPA was performed using divergent thinking, creative flexibility, curiosity and adventure, and inquiry as index variables, and the degree of individualization, interaction, and students' classroom engagement was used as the instruction method, and process fortified assessment and evaluation feedback were used as evaluation methods. For the analysis, the 6th year of the Korean Education Longitudinal Study 2013 were used. As a result of the study, first, creative thinking competency was classified into three latent profiles. Second, individualization was an influential variable that differentiated the ‘higher competency’ profile. Third, interaction did not affect creative thinking competency profile differentiation. Fourth, students' classroom engagement was the most important variable affecting the differentiation of all profiles. Fifth, process fortified assessment differentiated the ‘general competency’ and ‘higher competency’ profiles. Sixth, evaluation feedback affected the differentiation of all profiles. In order to improve creative thinking competency, it is necessary to create an environment that can foster learners' activeness and initiative attitude for student engagement classes. In addition, it should support process fortified assessment and evaluation feedback that can check the process as well as the result of learning.","PeriodicalId":186018,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society for Creativity Education","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society for Creativity Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36358/jce.2022.22.2.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purposes of this study were confirmed the student's creative thinking competency profile and the instructions and evaluation methods that affect the profile. LPA was performed using divergent thinking, creative flexibility, curiosity and adventure, and inquiry as index variables, and the degree of individualization, interaction, and students' classroom engagement was used as the instruction method, and process fortified assessment and evaluation feedback were used as evaluation methods. For the analysis, the 6th year of the Korean Education Longitudinal Study 2013 were used. As a result of the study, first, creative thinking competency was classified into three latent profiles. Second, individualization was an influential variable that differentiated the ‘higher competency’ profile. Third, interaction did not affect creative thinking competency profile differentiation. Fourth, students' classroom engagement was the most important variable affecting the differentiation of all profiles. Fifth, process fortified assessment differentiated the ‘general competency’ and ‘higher competency’ profiles. Sixth, evaluation feedback affected the differentiation of all profiles. In order to improve creative thinking competency, it is necessary to create an environment that can foster learners' activeness and initiative attitude for student engagement classes. In addition, it should support process fortified assessment and evaluation feedback that can check the process as well as the result of learning.
探索提高创造性思维能力的指导和评价方法
本研究的目的是确认学生的创造性思维能力特征,以及影响该特征的指导和评估方法。LPA以发散性思维、创造性灵活性、好奇心和冒险性、探究性为指标变量,以个性化程度、互动程度和学生课堂参与度为指导方法,以过程强化评价和评价反馈为评价方法。分析采用2013年韩国教育纵向研究第6年的数据。研究结果表明:首先,将创造性思维能力划分为三种潜在特征。第二,个性化是区分“高能力”特征的一个有影响的变量。第三,互动不影响创造性思维能力特征的差异。第四,学生的课堂参与度是影响所有档案差异的最重要变量。第五,过程强化评价区分了“一般胜任力”和“高级胜任力”。第六,评价反馈影响了各剖面的区分。为了提高学生的创造性思维能力,有必要在学生参与课堂中创造一个能够培养学习者的主动性和主动性的环境。此外,它应该支持过程强化的评估和评估反馈,可以检查过程和学习的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信