Rogue Aid? The Determinants of China’s Aid Allocation

A. Dreher, A. Fuchs
{"title":"Rogue Aid? The Determinants of China’s Aid Allocation","authors":"A. Dreher, A. Fuchs","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1926471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Foreign aid from China is often characterized as ‘rogue aid’ that is not guided by recipient need but by China’s national interests alone. However, no econometric study so far confronts this claim with data. We make use of various datasets, covering the 1956-2006 period, to empirically test to which extent political and commercial interests shape China’s aid allocation decisions. We estimate the determinants of China’s allocation of project aid, food aid, medical teams and total aid money to developing countries, comparing its allocation decisions with traditional and other so-called emerging donors. We find that political considerations are an important determinant of China’s allocation of aid. However, in comparison to other donors, China does not pay substantially more attention to politics. In contrast to widespread perceptions, we find no evidence that China’s aid allocation is dominated by natural resource endowments. Moreover, China’s allocation of aid seems to be widely independent of democracy and governance in recipient countries. Overall, denominating aid from China as ‘rogue aid’ seems unjustified.","PeriodicalId":309442,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Foreign Aid (Topic)","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"104","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Foreign Aid (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1926471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

Abstract

Foreign aid from China is often characterized as ‘rogue aid’ that is not guided by recipient need but by China’s national interests alone. However, no econometric study so far confronts this claim with data. We make use of various datasets, covering the 1956-2006 period, to empirically test to which extent political and commercial interests shape China’s aid allocation decisions. We estimate the determinants of China’s allocation of project aid, food aid, medical teams and total aid money to developing countries, comparing its allocation decisions with traditional and other so-called emerging donors. We find that political considerations are an important determinant of China’s allocation of aid. However, in comparison to other donors, China does not pay substantially more attention to politics. In contrast to widespread perceptions, we find no evidence that China’s aid allocation is dominated by natural resource endowments. Moreover, China’s allocation of aid seems to be widely independent of democracy and governance in recipient countries. Overall, denominating aid from China as ‘rogue aid’ seems unjustified.
流氓援助?中国援助分配的决定因素
中国的对外援助经常被描述为“流氓援助”,不以受援国的需要为导向,而只以中国的国家利益为导向。然而,到目前为止,还没有计量经济学研究用数据来反驳这一说法。我们利用涵盖1956-2006年期间的各种数据集,对政治和商业利益在多大程度上影响了中国的援助分配决策进行了实证检验。我们估计了中国向发展中国家分配项目援助、粮食援助、医疗队和援助总额的决定因素,并将其分配决策与传统和其他所谓的新兴捐助国进行了比较。我们发现,政治考虑是中国分配援助的一个重要决定因素。然而,与其他捐助国相比,中国对政治的关注并不多。与普遍的看法相反,我们没有发现证据表明中国的援助分配是由自然资源禀赋主导的。此外,中国的援助分配似乎在很大程度上独立于受援国的民主和治理。总的来说,将中国的援助称为“流氓援助”似乎是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信