B. Caravita, Simone Barbareschi, Francesco Severa, Sergio Spatola, Adriano Dirri
{"title":"Weak Institutions, Positive Results","authors":"B. Caravita, Simone Barbareschi, Francesco Severa, Sergio Spatola, Adriano Dirri","doi":"10.4324/9781003166771-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pandemic has proved to be the main economic challenge and a critical juncture for the European Union (EU) since the end of the Second World War. At the same time, the pandemic has tested the European institutional architecture, unveiling unresolved issues of that framework. This chapter discusses the response of the EU during the pandemic, which shifted from initially insufficient action to a better coordination during the subsequent months of March/April and May 2020. Coordination was the main task of the European Commission, which eventually led to a concrete action of solidarity, through various measures for economic relief. Nonetheless, the pandemic shall be included within the context of a decade of crisis in the EU. Hence, the issues regarding the pandemic have underlined the old fractures of the EU - on one hand, the North-South divide between the member states, and on the other hand, the debate over a more supranational integration versus the intergovernmental method. This chapter underscores that the EU was not able to face such an emergency at the beginning and that the European Council decisions of July 2020 may renew European integration. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.","PeriodicalId":130880,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003166771-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
薄弱的机构,积极的结果
事实证明,这一流行病是第二次世界大战结束以来欧洲联盟(欧盟)面临的主要经济挑战和关键时刻。与此同时,大流行考验了欧洲的体制架构,暴露了该框架中尚未解决的问题。本章讨论了欧盟在大流行期间的应对措施,在随后的2020年3月/ 4月和5月期间,欧盟从最初的行动不足转变为更好的协调。协调是欧洲委员会的主要任务,这最终导致通过各种经济救济措施采取团结一致的具体行动。尽管如此,这场大流行病应被纳入欧盟十年危机的范畴。因此,有关大流行病的问题凸显了欧盟的旧裂痕——一方面是成员国之间的南北分歧,另一方面是关于超国家一体化与政府间一体化的辩论。本章强调,欧盟在一开始就无法面对这样的紧急情况,欧洲理事会2020年7月的决定可能会重启欧洲一体化。©2022选择和编辑事项,Nico Steytler。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。