PROFIL HOTS MAHASISWA DIII TEKNIK KIMIA POLITEKNIK NEGERI BANDUNG KARENA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA DIBeK&P2D

I. G. Rasagama, I. Mahardika, Nyoto Suseno, Kunlestiowati Hadiningrum, Hermagasantos Zein, Agus Setiawan
{"title":"PROFIL HOTS MAHASISWA DIII TEKNIK KIMIA POLITEKNIK NEGERI BANDUNG KARENA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA DIBeK&P2D","authors":"I. G. Rasagama, I. Mahardika, Nyoto Suseno, Kunlestiowati Hadiningrum, Hermagasantos Zein, Agus Setiawan","doi":"10.24114/JIAF.V6I3.19679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research objective was to determine the profile of the increase in thinking skills to analyze, evaluate, and the sub-ability to think in it due to the implementation of the physics learning model, the results of the R&D that had been done. As research subjects, 56 students from the Bandung State Polytechnic Chemical Engineering Study Program were involved. This research used a quasi-experimental method with pre-test post-test control group design. Research shows that the increase in analyzing ability, evaluation ability, organizing sub-ability, checking sub-ability, and critiquing sub-ability through the DIBeK&P2D learning model is higher than the conventional learning method (lecture), equal to the defferentiating sub-ability, and lower for the sub-ability attributing. Significantly different improvements occurred for total thinking ability, organizing sub-ability, checking sub-ability, and critiquing sub-ability. The increase was not significantly different for the ability to analyze, the ability to evaluate, the differentiating sub-ability, and the attributing sub-ability.","PeriodicalId":201408,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL IKATAN ALUMNI FISIKA","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL IKATAN ALUMNI FISIKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/JIAF.V6I3.19679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research objective was to determine the profile of the increase in thinking skills to analyze, evaluate, and the sub-ability to think in it due to the implementation of the physics learning model, the results of the R&D that had been done. As research subjects, 56 students from the Bandung State Polytechnic Chemical Engineering Study Program were involved. This research used a quasi-experimental method with pre-test post-test control group design. Research shows that the increase in analyzing ability, evaluation ability, organizing sub-ability, checking sub-ability, and critiquing sub-ability through the DIBeK&P2D learning model is higher than the conventional learning method (lecture), equal to the defferentiating sub-ability, and lower for the sub-ability attributing. Significantly different improvements occurred for total thinking ability, organizing sub-ability, checking sub-ability, and critiquing sub-ability. The increase was not significantly different for the ability to analyze, the ability to evaluate, the differentiating sub-ability, and the attributing sub-ability.
万隆理工学院化学工程学生简介,因为m&p2d的物理学习模式
本研究的目的是确定由于物理学习模式的实施,学生的分析、评价思维能力和子思维能力的提高概况,以及所做的研发成果。研究对象为来自万隆国立理工学院化学工程研究项目的56名学生。本研究采用准实验方法,采用前测后测对照组设计。研究表明,DIBeK&P2D学习模式对分析能力、评价能力、组织能力、检查能力、批判能力的提高高于常规学习方法(讲座),与区分能力持平,对子能力归因能力的提高较低。总体思维能力、组织能力、检查能力和批评能力有显著性差异。分析能力、评价能力、区分能力和归因能力的提高无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信