A Communication Perspective on the Fabric of Thinking Infrastructure: the Case of Social Media Analytics

F. Lambotte
{"title":"A Communication Perspective on the Fabric of Thinking Infrastructure: the Case of Social Media Analytics","authors":"F. Lambotte","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X20190000062019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digital and material traceability of our interactions in organizations are nowadays the subject of very advanced analyses through tools known as social media analytics (SMA). As thinking (infrastructure), SMA tools constitute objects to think of our digitally mediated interactions with. It produces a substratum (a new meaning) that would not exist otherwise, and enacts different types of reasoning that hypothetically influence community managers’ or members’ sensemaking of digitally mediated interactions. This chapter proposes to look behind the curtain of charts and graphs, in order to highlight the performativity of the interactions between the different machines and the traces of our digitally mediated interactions. Drawing on a detailed analysis of the fabric of SMA, this chapter highlights the explanatory power of a communication perspective on types of reasoning enacted by thinking infrastructures. First, considering the SMA tool as an editorial enunciation allows us to see it as a process implying several beings (e.g. machines, humans and logs) that are not without consequences. Second, we show that these beings have different modalities of interactions with each other, and that these modalities of interactions influence the materiality of the digital traces of past interactions. Third, throughout the process, we demonstrate the fragility and variability of their materiality. Finally, faced with the rise of a technological deterministic discourse, which tends to portray the exploitation of our digital traces as an objective way of representing the collaborative practices that make up the organization, our research aims, on the contrary, to demonstrate their relativity.","PeriodicalId":259781,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Infrastructures","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Infrastructures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000062019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digital and material traceability of our interactions in organizations are nowadays the subject of very advanced analyses through tools known as social media analytics (SMA). As thinking (infrastructure), SMA tools constitute objects to think of our digitally mediated interactions with. It produces a substratum (a new meaning) that would not exist otherwise, and enacts different types of reasoning that hypothetically influence community managers’ or members’ sensemaking of digitally mediated interactions. This chapter proposes to look behind the curtain of charts and graphs, in order to highlight the performativity of the interactions between the different machines and the traces of our digitally mediated interactions. Drawing on a detailed analysis of the fabric of SMA, this chapter highlights the explanatory power of a communication perspective on types of reasoning enacted by thinking infrastructures. First, considering the SMA tool as an editorial enunciation allows us to see it as a process implying several beings (e.g. machines, humans and logs) that are not without consequences. Second, we show that these beings have different modalities of interactions with each other, and that these modalities of interactions influence the materiality of the digital traces of past interactions. Third, throughout the process, we demonstrate the fragility and variability of their materiality. Finally, faced with the rise of a technological deterministic discourse, which tends to portray the exploitation of our digital traces as an objective way of representing the collaborative practices that make up the organization, our research aims, on the contrary, to demonstrate their relativity.
思维基础结构结构的传播视角:以社交媒体分析为例
如今,我们在组织中互动的数字和材料可追溯性是通过社交媒体分析(SMA)工具进行非常高级分析的主题。作为思维(基础设施),SMA工具构成了思考我们与数字媒介互动的对象。它产生了一种原本不存在的基础(一种新的意义),并制定了不同类型的推理,假设影响社区管理者或成员对数字媒介互动的理解。本章建议通过图表和图形来揭示不同机器之间交互的表现力,以及我们以数字媒介进行交互的痕迹。通过对SMA结构的详细分析,本章强调了沟通视角对思维基础设施制定的推理类型的解释力。首先,将SMA工具视为一种编辑性的表达,可以让我们将其视为一个过程,它暗示着几个存在(例如机器、人类和日志)并非没有后果。其次,我们展示了这些生物彼此之间有不同的互动方式,这些互动方式影响了过去互动的数字痕迹的实质性。第三,在整个过程中,我们展示了其材料的脆弱性和可变性。最后,面对一种技术决定论话语的兴起,这种话语倾向于将我们对数字痕迹的利用描述为代表构成组织的协作实践的客观方式,相反,我们的研究目标是证明它们的相对性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信