CASSATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE DRAFT STATUTE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE OF 1863

A. Kovalchuk
{"title":"CASSATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE DRAFT STATUTE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE OF 1863","authors":"A. Kovalchuk","doi":"10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(1).94-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The creation of a system of cassation courts of general jurisdiction organized on an extraterritorial basis and other significant changes in modern cassation proceedings quite obviously mediate a new wave of scientific interest in the history of the development of a system for verifying judicial acts in the domestic tradition of civil procedure. In this regard, the experience in carrying out the Judicial Reform of 1864, in particular, enforcement of the Statute of Civil Procedure regularized the cassation institution for the first time, became relevant. At the same time, despite the fact that many modern scientific works are devoted to the study of the Statute of Civil Procedure of 1864 itself (including possibilities for appealing court decisions provided for thereby), the studies of foregoing drafts also stay relevant. The draft of 1863 is one such example. This article is devoted to the analysis of this draft in accordance with the declared topic. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to describe the draft Statute of Civil Procedure of 1863 in the context of its provisions defining the content of cassation institution. Methods. In the framework of the study, mainly historical-legal and comparative-legal methods were used. Results. The significance of the draft Statute of Civil Procedure of 1863, in the context of establishment and development of cassation institution in the civil procedure of the Russian Empire, was manifested, first of all, in a sufficiently clear consolidation in it of the very grounds for cassation of decisions. Its definitions are very similar to its provisions have been already consolidated in the Statute of Civil Procedure of 1864. At the same time, existing in that period distinction between terms “cassation” and “revision” promoted the consolidation of two basic tasks of cassation proceedings in the provisions of the Statute of Civil Procedure of 1863: verifying of the final decisions for judicial errors with the purpose of their subsequent elimination and ensuring uniform application and interpretation of the law. Conclusion. The draft Statute of Civil Procedure of 1863, having incorporated the ideas of many subsequent legislative works into itself, became some sort of provisional result of development of the necessity of cassation court in the Russian Empire of the 1800s – 1860s. At the same time, of course, the work on drafting the Statute of Civil Procedure did not end there, wherefore the draft was actively discussed and improved, and its main provisions regarding the regulation of the cassation proceedings formed the basis of the Statute of November 20, 1864.","PeriodicalId":310093,"journal":{"name":"Herald of Omsk University. Series: Law","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of Omsk University. Series: Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(1).94-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The creation of a system of cassation courts of general jurisdiction organized on an extraterritorial basis and other significant changes in modern cassation proceedings quite obviously mediate a new wave of scientific interest in the history of the development of a system for verifying judicial acts in the domestic tradition of civil procedure. In this regard, the experience in carrying out the Judicial Reform of 1864, in particular, enforcement of the Statute of Civil Procedure regularized the cassation institution for the first time, became relevant. At the same time, despite the fact that many modern scientific works are devoted to the study of the Statute of Civil Procedure of 1864 itself (including possibilities for appealing court decisions provided for thereby), the studies of foregoing drafts also stay relevant. The draft of 1863 is one such example. This article is devoted to the analysis of this draft in accordance with the declared topic. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to describe the draft Statute of Civil Procedure of 1863 in the context of its provisions defining the content of cassation institution. Methods. In the framework of the study, mainly historical-legal and comparative-legal methods were used. Results. The significance of the draft Statute of Civil Procedure of 1863, in the context of establishment and development of cassation institution in the civil procedure of the Russian Empire, was manifested, first of all, in a sufficiently clear consolidation in it of the very grounds for cassation of decisions. Its definitions are very similar to its provisions have been already consolidated in the Statute of Civil Procedure of 1864. At the same time, existing in that period distinction between terms “cassation” and “revision” promoted the consolidation of two basic tasks of cassation proceedings in the provisions of the Statute of Civil Procedure of 1863: verifying of the final decisions for judicial errors with the purpose of their subsequent elimination and ensuring uniform application and interpretation of the law. Conclusion. The draft Statute of Civil Procedure of 1863, having incorporated the ideas of many subsequent legislative works into itself, became some sort of provisional result of development of the necessity of cassation court in the Russian Empire of the 1800s – 1860s. At the same time, of course, the work on drafting the Statute of Civil Procedure did not end there, wherefore the draft was actively discussed and improved, and its main provisions regarding the regulation of the cassation proceedings formed the basis of the Statute of November 20, 1864.
1863年民事诉讼法草案下的上诉程序
介绍。在域外基础上组织的具有一般管辖权的上诉法院制度的建立,以及现代上诉程序中的其他重大变化,很明显地引起了科学界对在国内民事诉讼传统中核实司法行为制度发展历史的新一波兴趣。在这方面,1864年进行司法改革的经验,特别是《民事诉讼规约》的执行使上诉制度第一次正规化,具有重要意义。与此同时,尽管许多现代科学著作都致力于研究1864年《民事诉讼法》本身(包括由此规定的上诉法院判决的可能性),但对上述草案的研究仍然具有相关性。1863年的草案就是这样一个例子。本文将按照声明的主题对该草案进行分析。目的。本研究的目的是在1863年民事诉讼法草案的背景下描述其规定的撤诉制度的内容。方法。在研究框架中,主要使用了历史法学和比较法学方法。结果。1863年《民事诉讼规约》草案的意义,在俄罗斯帝国民事诉讼中撤销制度的建立和发展的背景下,首先表现在它充分明确地巩固了撤销判决的理由。它的定义与1864年《民事诉讼规约》中已经巩固的规定非常相似。同时,在这一时期,“撤销”和“修订”两词之间存在的区别促进了1863年《民事诉讼规约》规定中撤销诉讼程序的两项基本任务的巩固:核查司法错误的最后判决,以便随后予以消除,并确保法律的统一适用和解释。结论。1863年的《民事诉讼法》草案吸收了后来许多立法著作的思想,成为19世纪至60年代俄罗斯帝国废除上诉法院必要性发展的某种临时结果。当然,与此同时,起草《民事诉讼法》的工作并没有就此结束,因此对草案进行了积极的讨论和完善,其中关于上诉程序规定的主要条款构成了1864年11月20日《民事诉讼法》的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信