The quest for quality tags

Shilad Sen, F. M. Harper, Adam LaPitz, J. Riedl
{"title":"The quest for quality tags","authors":"Shilad Sen, F. M. Harper, Adam LaPitz, J. Riedl","doi":"10.1145/1316624.1316678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many online communities use tags - community selected words or phrases - to help people find what they desire. The quality of tags varies widely, from tags that capture akey dimension of an entity to those that are profane, useless, or unintelligible. Tagging systems must often select a subset of available tags to display to users due to limited screen space. Because users often spread tags they have seen, selecting good tags not only improves an individual's view of tags, it also encourages them to create better tags in the future. We explore implicit (behavioral) and explicit (rating) mechanisms for determining tag quality. Based on 102,056 tag ratings and survey responses collected from 1,039 users over 100 days, we offer simple suggestions to designers of online communities to improve the quality of tags seen by their users.","PeriodicalId":445069,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"100","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 100

Abstract

Many online communities use tags - community selected words or phrases - to help people find what they desire. The quality of tags varies widely, from tags that capture akey dimension of an entity to those that are profane, useless, or unintelligible. Tagging systems must often select a subset of available tags to display to users due to limited screen space. Because users often spread tags they have seen, selecting good tags not only improves an individual's view of tags, it also encourages them to create better tags in the future. We explore implicit (behavioral) and explicit (rating) mechanisms for determining tag quality. Based on 102,056 tag ratings and survey responses collected from 1,039 users over 100 days, we offer simple suggestions to designers of online communities to improve the quality of tags seen by their users.
对质量标签的追求
许多在线社区使用标签——社区选择的单词或短语——来帮助人们找到他们想要的东西。标签的质量差别很大,从捕获实体的关键维度的标签到那些亵渎,无用或难以理解的标签。由于屏幕空间有限,标记系统通常必须选择可用标记的一个子集来显示给用户。因为用户经常传播他们看到的标签,选择好的标签不仅可以提高个人对标签的看法,还可以鼓励他们在将来创建更好的标签。我们探讨了确定标签质量的内隐(行为)和外显(评级)机制。基于100天内102056个标签评级和1039个用户的调查反馈,我们为在线社区的设计师提供了简单的建议,以提高用户看到的标签质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信