EU EXPERIENCE IN THE APPLICATION OF AGROECOLOGICAL SCHEMES IN THE SPHERE OF PROTECTION OF BIODIVERSITY OF PROTECTED AREAS

O. Kobzar
{"title":"EU EXPERIENCE IN THE APPLICATION OF AGROECOLOGICAL SCHEMES IN THE SPHERE OF PROTECTION OF BIODIVERSITY OF PROTECTED AREAS","authors":"O. Kobzar","doi":"10.32782/2415-8801/2022-3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the scientific and organizational bases for the development and implementation of agro-ecological schemes, according to which payments are paid for achieving results in the field of conservation of biodiversity of protected areas. It is noted that in practice there exists a continuum of approaches to delivering biodiversity objectives on agricultural land within the boundaries of protected areas and areas with high natural value, ranging from the more conventional management-based approaches, to those approaches that reward only the results that are achieved, irrespective of the methods used. Results-based payments create a market for environmental services, including biodiversity. Production of these services needs to be incentivised on areas best placed to deliver on specific target. For biodiversity this includes Natura 2000 and land of similar character and high nature value farmland. Results-based payments relate to the achievement of a defined environmental result, and the farmer or land manager is allowed the flexibility to choose the most appropriate management to achieve that result (in contrast to management-based schemes where the farmer is contracted to undertake specific actions). With results-based payments there are typically varying levels of payment, where the level of payment reflects the quality of the biodiversity, or level of achievement of other environmental targets, assessed at field level. Also identified that for results-based schemes the calculation payment is based on the income foregone and additional costs incurred in implementing the typical farming practices required to achieve the result indicators and transaction costs. It is concluded that overwhelming benefits of the results-based payments approach are the associated tiered payments which are both financially efficient and incentivise higher quality results; the opportunity for farmers to use their management skills, professional judgment and farm knowledge. The main problem for the implementation of effective results-based schemes is the presence good data about the dynamic relationship between the target ecosystems and the economics and management choices of the farming systems that support them.","PeriodicalId":395338,"journal":{"name":"Intellect XXІ","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellect XXІ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8801/2022-3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the scientific and organizational bases for the development and implementation of agro-ecological schemes, according to which payments are paid for achieving results in the field of conservation of biodiversity of protected areas. It is noted that in practice there exists a continuum of approaches to delivering biodiversity objectives on agricultural land within the boundaries of protected areas and areas with high natural value, ranging from the more conventional management-based approaches, to those approaches that reward only the results that are achieved, irrespective of the methods used. Results-based payments create a market for environmental services, including biodiversity. Production of these services needs to be incentivised on areas best placed to deliver on specific target. For biodiversity this includes Natura 2000 and land of similar character and high nature value farmland. Results-based payments relate to the achievement of a defined environmental result, and the farmer or land manager is allowed the flexibility to choose the most appropriate management to achieve that result (in contrast to management-based schemes where the farmer is contracted to undertake specific actions). With results-based payments there are typically varying levels of payment, where the level of payment reflects the quality of the biodiversity, or level of achievement of other environmental targets, assessed at field level. Also identified that for results-based schemes the calculation payment is based on the income foregone and additional costs incurred in implementing the typical farming practices required to achieve the result indicators and transaction costs. It is concluded that overwhelming benefits of the results-based payments approach are the associated tiered payments which are both financially efficient and incentivise higher quality results; the opportunity for farmers to use their management skills, professional judgment and farm knowledge. The main problem for the implementation of effective results-based schemes is the presence good data about the dynamic relationship between the target ecosystems and the economics and management choices of the farming systems that support them.
欧盟在保护保护区生物多样性方面应用农业生态计划的经验
本文考虑了制定和实施农业生态计划的科学和组织基础,根据这些计划,在保护保护区生物多样性领域取得成果时支付费用。值得注意的是,在实践中,在保护区和具有高自然价值的地区边界内的农业用地上实现生物多样性目标的方法是连续的,从更传统的基于管理的方法到那些无论使用何种方法都只奖励取得成果的方法。基于结果的支付为包括生物多样性在内的环境服务创造了一个市场。这些服务的生产需要在最适合实现特定目标的领域进行激励。就生物多样性而言,这包括Natura 2000和具有类似特征的土地和高自然价值的农田。基于结果的支付与实现确定的环境结果有关,允许农民或土地管理者灵活地选择最适当的管理方法来实现这一结果(与基于管理的方案相反,在这种方案中,农民签订合同采取具体行动)。基于结果的支付通常有不同的支付水平,其中支付水平反映了在实地一级评估的生物多样性的质量或其他环境目标的实现水平。还确定,对于结果导向型计划,计算付款是根据为实现结果指标和交易成本而实施典型耕作方法所放弃的收入和额外费用。结论是,基于结果的支付方法的巨大好处是相关的分层支付,既具有财务效率,又能激励更高质量的结果;让农民有机会运用他们的管理技能、专业判断和农业知识。实施有效的基于结果的计划的主要问题是,关于目标生态系统与支持它们的农业系统的经济和管理选择之间的动态关系的良好数据的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信