Managerial perception on the application of the balanced scorecard evaluation approach

P. Shrestha
{"title":"Managerial perception on the application of the balanced scorecard evaluation approach","authors":"P. Shrestha","doi":"10.3126/nccj.v5i1.56947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the managerial perception of the application of the balanced scorecard (BSC) evaluation approach. It considers the main four perspectives of the BSC evaluation approach including the financial, the  customer, the  internal processes, and the  learning and growth perspective. This study is primarily descriptive in nature. The questionnaire was delivered to nine commercial bank managers, including three state-owned banks, three joint-venture banks, and three private banks. A total of 180 questionnaires were distributed to them, and 129 (71.67%) were returned and used. The results reveal that Nepalese bank managers have a perception of a better financial position. They use the financial perspective as an important aspect of the BSC evaluation approach when measuring bank performance. In terms of customer perspective, the results show that banks have better customer connections. It also suggests that Nepalese bank managers believe that using customer viewpoints is critical to the performance of their institutions. In practice, both the internal process and the learning and growth perspective appear to be fair. As a result, Nepalese commercial banks succeed in each of the four aspects of the BSC evaluation approach.","PeriodicalId":403873,"journal":{"name":"NCC Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NCC Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nccj.v5i1.56947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the managerial perception of the application of the balanced scorecard (BSC) evaluation approach. It considers the main four perspectives of the BSC evaluation approach including the financial, the  customer, the  internal processes, and the  learning and growth perspective. This study is primarily descriptive in nature. The questionnaire was delivered to nine commercial bank managers, including three state-owned banks, three joint-venture banks, and three private banks. A total of 180 questionnaires were distributed to them, and 129 (71.67%) were returned and used. The results reveal that Nepalese bank managers have a perception of a better financial position. They use the financial perspective as an important aspect of the BSC evaluation approach when measuring bank performance. In terms of customer perspective, the results show that banks have better customer connections. It also suggests that Nepalese bank managers believe that using customer viewpoints is critical to the performance of their institutions. In practice, both the internal process and the learning and growth perspective appear to be fair. As a result, Nepalese commercial banks succeed in each of the four aspects of the BSC evaluation approach.
管理人员对平衡计分卡评估方法应用的看法
本研究旨在探讨管理阶层对运用平衡计分卡(BSC)评估方法的认知。它考虑了平衡记分卡评价方法的四个主要视角,包括财务、客户、内部流程以及学习和成长视角。这项研究主要是描述性的。调查问卷发放给了9家商业银行的经理,其中包括3家国有银行、3家合资银行和3家民营银行。共发放问卷180份,回收使用问卷129份,占71.67%。结果显示,尼泊尔的银行经理有一个更好的财务状况的看法。他们在衡量银行绩效时,将财务角度作为平衡计分卡评估方法的一个重要方面。在客户视角方面,结果显示银行有更好的客户关系。研究还表明,尼泊尔的银行经理认为,使用客户观点对其机构的绩效至关重要。在实践中,无论是内部过程还是学习和成长的角度都是公平的。因此,尼泊尔商业银行在平衡计分卡评价方法的四个方面都取得了成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信