Earnings management and cash holdings: Evidence from energy firms in Vietnam

Nguyen Vinh Khuong, N. Liem, M. Minh
{"title":"Earnings management and cash holdings: Evidence from energy firms in Vietnam","authors":"Nguyen Vinh Khuong, N. Liem, M. Minh","doi":"10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-1/16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earnings management practices can exacerbate information asymmetry between stakeholders such as creditors, suppliers and investors and the focal firm. However, different types of earnings management can lead to diverse consequences due to their different associations with information asymmetry and agency cost. In this study, we investigate the relationship between accrual-based earnings management (AEM), real activities management (RAM) and corporate cash holdings. The research findings suggest that real activities management has a positive impact on cash holdings, while accruals-based earnings management, has a negative impact on this measure. Our findings are robust to different measures of AEM, RAM and model specifications. The positive link between RAM and cash holdings implies that significant diminutions in discretionary production costs and selling expenses permit managers to mask the genuine performance of the firm, thus increasing information asymmetry. On the other hand, the inverse relationship between AEM and cash holdings may prove that accruals can be helpful in alleviating the information differentials between the firm and other stakeholders. Based on the research findings, we provide several implications for relevant stakeholders regarding the link between earnings management and cash holdings. Received: April, 2019 1st Revision: September, 2019 Accepted: February, 2020 DOI: 10.14254/20718330.2020/13-1/16 Journal of International Studies S ci en ti fi c P a pe rs © Foundation of International Studies, 2020 © CSR, 2020 Journal of International Studies Vol.13, No.1, 2020 248","PeriodicalId":330787,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of international studies","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of international studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-1/16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Earnings management practices can exacerbate information asymmetry between stakeholders such as creditors, suppliers and investors and the focal firm. However, different types of earnings management can lead to diverse consequences due to their different associations with information asymmetry and agency cost. In this study, we investigate the relationship between accrual-based earnings management (AEM), real activities management (RAM) and corporate cash holdings. The research findings suggest that real activities management has a positive impact on cash holdings, while accruals-based earnings management, has a negative impact on this measure. Our findings are robust to different measures of AEM, RAM and model specifications. The positive link between RAM and cash holdings implies that significant diminutions in discretionary production costs and selling expenses permit managers to mask the genuine performance of the firm, thus increasing information asymmetry. On the other hand, the inverse relationship between AEM and cash holdings may prove that accruals can be helpful in alleviating the information differentials between the firm and other stakeholders. Based on the research findings, we provide several implications for relevant stakeholders regarding the link between earnings management and cash holdings. Received: April, 2019 1st Revision: September, 2019 Accepted: February, 2020 DOI: 10.14254/20718330.2020/13-1/16 Journal of International Studies S ci en ti fi c P a pe rs © Foundation of International Studies, 2020 © CSR, 2020 Journal of International Studies Vol.13, No.1, 2020 248
盈余管理与现金持有:来自越南能源公司的证据
盈余管理实践会加剧债权人、供应商、投资者和焦点公司等利益相关者之间的信息不对称。然而,不同类型的盈余管理由于其与信息不对称和代理成本的不同关联而导致不同的后果。在本研究中,我们探讨了基于权责发生制的盈余管理(AEM)、真实活动管理(RAM)和企业现金持有量之间的关系。研究结果表明,真实活动管理对现金持有量有积极影响,而基于应计制的盈余管理对这一措施有消极影响。我们的发现是稳健的不同措施的AEM, RAM和模型规格。RAM和现金持有量之间的正相关关系意味着,可自由支配的生产成本和销售费用的显著减少,使管理者能够掩盖公司的真实业绩,从而增加了信息不对称。另一方面,AEM与现金持有量之间的负相关关系可能证明应计利润有助于缓解公司与其他利益相关者之间的信息差异。基于研究结果,我们为相关利益相关者提供了关于盈余管理与现金持有之间联系的几点启示。收稿日期:2019年4月第一次修稿日期:2019年9月接收日期:2020年2月DOI: 10.14254/20718330.2020/13-1/16国际研究学报S ci en ti fi c P a pe rs©国际研究基金会,2020©CSR, 2020国际研究学报第13卷,第1期,2020 248
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信