Rheumatic Diseases and Biosimilars: Evidence about Switch from Originators to Biosimilars in the Real Life

Maria Chiara Ditto, S. Parisi, R. Talotta, M. Priora, R. Borrelli, E. Fusaro
{"title":"Rheumatic Diseases and Biosimilars: Evidence about Switch from Originators to Biosimilars in the Real Life","authors":"Maria Chiara Ditto, S. Parisi, R. Talotta, M. Priora, R. Borrelli, E. Fusaro","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.100128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biosimilars are broadly available for the treatment of several diseases including inflammatory arthritis. Thanks to biosimilars it has been possible to treat a greater number of rheumatic patients who previously were undertreated due to the high cost of originators, in several countries. There are a lot of data from double blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials, especially on TNF inhibitors (TNFi), concerning the maintenance of clinical efficacy after switching from originators to biosimilars; therefore, such a transition is increasingly encouraged both in the US and Europe mainly for economic reasons. However, despite the considerable saving, such shifts to biosimilar drugs are still being debated, principally over their ethical implications. Since the drugs are similar but not identical, the main issues are related to the possibility to compare the adverse events and/or the lack of efficacy and, to date, the variability in effectiveness for a single patient remains an unpredictable datum before effecting the switch. Despite encouraging data about the maintenance of efficacy and safety after the switch, there are many reports of discontinuation due both lack of efficacy or and adverse events. In this chapter we aim at showing the disease activity trend and the safety after the transition to TNF-i biosimilars in patients with rheumatic diseases in real life..","PeriodicalId":383787,"journal":{"name":"Biosimilars [Working Title]","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosimilars [Working Title]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.100128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biosimilars are broadly available for the treatment of several diseases including inflammatory arthritis. Thanks to biosimilars it has been possible to treat a greater number of rheumatic patients who previously were undertreated due to the high cost of originators, in several countries. There are a lot of data from double blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials, especially on TNF inhibitors (TNFi), concerning the maintenance of clinical efficacy after switching from originators to biosimilars; therefore, such a transition is increasingly encouraged both in the US and Europe mainly for economic reasons. However, despite the considerable saving, such shifts to biosimilar drugs are still being debated, principally over their ethical implications. Since the drugs are similar but not identical, the main issues are related to the possibility to compare the adverse events and/or the lack of efficacy and, to date, the variability in effectiveness for a single patient remains an unpredictable datum before effecting the switch. Despite encouraging data about the maintenance of efficacy and safety after the switch, there are many reports of discontinuation due both lack of efficacy or and adverse events. In this chapter we aim at showing the disease activity trend and the safety after the transition to TNF-i biosimilars in patients with rheumatic diseases in real life..
风湿病和生物仿制药:现实生活中从发起人转向生物仿制药的证据
生物仿制药广泛用于治疗包括炎症性关节炎在内的几种疾病。由于生物仿制药的存在,在一些国家,以前由于原料药的高成本而得不到充分治疗的大量风湿病患者有可能得到治疗。从双盲、随机、对照临床试验,特别是TNF抑制剂(TNFi)的临床试验中,有大量关于从原研药物转向生物仿制药后临床疗效维持的数据;因此,这种转变在美国和欧洲越来越受到鼓励,主要是出于经济原因。然而,尽管节省了相当大的成本,这种向生物仿制药的转变仍在争论中,主要是关于其伦理影响。由于药物相似但不完全相同,主要问题与比较不良事件和/或缺乏疗效的可能性有关,到目前为止,单个患者的有效性变化仍然是一个不可预测的数据,然后再进行转换。尽管关于转换后疗效和安全性维持的数据令人鼓舞,但仍有许多由于缺乏疗效或不良事件而停药的报告。在本章中,我们旨在展示现实生活中风湿病患者过渡到TNF-i生物仿制药后的疾病活动性趋势和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信