Conversations with Stuart Hall: What do migrants represent?

A. Sarkar
{"title":"Conversations with Stuart Hall: What do migrants represent?","authors":"A. Sarkar","doi":"10.3898/SOUN.71.09.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this set of three discussions, the contributors look at Hall's work on modernisation and its meanings; post-Fordism and disorganised capitalism; and race and migration. Hall's discussions of post-Fordism, regarded by some as representing modernity (though characterised by others as disorganised capitalism), were informed by the view that this was an age to which either a progressive or a regressive politics could be articulated. Reactionary responses have been in the ascendant in Britain in the last few years, and modernity has been too often experienced as neoliberal globalisation. The British left has yet to find a strong counter-narrative, including on the question of nation. It needs to find a narrative capable of including both social liberals and more traditional left voters, and the progressive elements in both the middle and working classes. This cannot be done without a democratic sense of nation. The left is better at addressing questions of inequality and social justice than it is in connecting to progressive ideas about identity and the nations of the UK. It also needs to tackle the racist framing of much of the debate on migration, including the subliminal (though sometimes overt) message that all black and Asian people are 'immigrants', regardless of how long they and their families have lived in the UK.","PeriodicalId":403400,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/SOUN.71.09.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In this set of three discussions, the contributors look at Hall's work on modernisation and its meanings; post-Fordism and disorganised capitalism; and race and migration. Hall's discussions of post-Fordism, regarded by some as representing modernity (though characterised by others as disorganised capitalism), were informed by the view that this was an age to which either a progressive or a regressive politics could be articulated. Reactionary responses have been in the ascendant in Britain in the last few years, and modernity has been too often experienced as neoliberal globalisation. The British left has yet to find a strong counter-narrative, including on the question of nation. It needs to find a narrative capable of including both social liberals and more traditional left voters, and the progressive elements in both the middle and working classes. This cannot be done without a democratic sense of nation. The left is better at addressing questions of inequality and social justice than it is in connecting to progressive ideas about identity and the nations of the UK. It also needs to tackle the racist framing of much of the debate on migration, including the subliminal (though sometimes overt) message that all black and Asian people are 'immigrants', regardless of how long they and their families have lived in the UK.
对话Stuart Hall:移民代表着什么?
摘要:在这三组讨论中,作者审视了霍尔关于现代化及其意义的工作;后福特主义和无组织的资本主义;还有种族和移民。霍尔对后福特主义的讨论,被一些人视为现代性的代表(尽管另一些人将其描述为无组织的资本主义),受到这样一种观点的影响,即这是一个可以明确表达进步或倒退政治的时代。在过去的几年里,英国的反动反应一直在上升,而现代性往往被视为新自由主义的全球化。英国左翼尚未找到一个强有力的反叙事,包括在国家问题上。它需要找到一种叙事方式,既能包容社会自由派和更传统的左翼选民,也能包容中产阶级和工人阶级中的进步分子。没有民主的民族意识,这是不可能做到的。左派更擅长解决不平等和社会正义问题,而不是与有关身份认同和英国各民族的进步思想联系起来。它还需要解决关于移民的许多辩论中的种族主义框架,包括潜意识(尽管有时是公开的)的信息,即所有黑人和亚洲人都是“移民”,无论他们和他们的家人在英国生活了多长时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信