The German experience in implementation of blended learning strategies

K. Osadcha
{"title":"The German experience in implementation of blended learning strategies","authors":"K. Osadcha","doi":"10.28925/2312-5829.2022.3410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, based on the analysis of the scientific works of German scientists from 2006 to 2021, the conclusion is made about the incentives for the spread of blended education in Germany: unacceptable distances to the nearest educational institutions; special religious and language needs that local educational institutions are unable or unwilling to meet; individuality of learning; avoiding social problems resulting from face-to-face communication; consolidation of educational materials and increase of hours for independent study. The strategies of blended learning at higher education institutions are highlighted: the strategy of preliminary development of materials for face-to-face learning and subsequent development of materials for electronic learning, taking into account the individual preferences of students (J. Dammeier, S. Merten); the combination of equal volume of theoretical and practical materials in a clear, implemented and measurable approach with the aim of purposeful development of practical knowledge in face-to-face and electronic learning as parts of blended learning, (T. Bosch); creation of a hybrid learning environment that allows students to use the advantages of electronic submission and preparation of reports on practical work (M. Amelung, D. Rösner); careful planning of online learning stages based on the didactic triangle (D. Petko); supporting the idea of a \"flipped classroom\" where classroom activities are used for interactive and collaborative, experiential, dialogic learning instead of teacher-centered knowledge dissemination (M. Brand, K. Mahlke); basing blended learning on the basis of video lectures developed by using a standardized solution for the entire educational institution (T. Hirmer, A. Henrich); creation of a hybrid campus based on multimodal learning (A. Skulmowski, G. D. Rey); chronological arrangement of the elements of the educational offer for the desired success in education (K. Keller, D. Klinkhammer, E.-M. Rottlaender).","PeriodicalId":289326,"journal":{"name":"Educological discourse","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educological discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2022.3410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article, based on the analysis of the scientific works of German scientists from 2006 to 2021, the conclusion is made about the incentives for the spread of blended education in Germany: unacceptable distances to the nearest educational institutions; special religious and language needs that local educational institutions are unable or unwilling to meet; individuality of learning; avoiding social problems resulting from face-to-face communication; consolidation of educational materials and increase of hours for independent study. The strategies of blended learning at higher education institutions are highlighted: the strategy of preliminary development of materials for face-to-face learning and subsequent development of materials for electronic learning, taking into account the individual preferences of students (J. Dammeier, S. Merten); the combination of equal volume of theoretical and practical materials in a clear, implemented and measurable approach with the aim of purposeful development of practical knowledge in face-to-face and electronic learning as parts of blended learning, (T. Bosch); creation of a hybrid learning environment that allows students to use the advantages of electronic submission and preparation of reports on practical work (M. Amelung, D. Rösner); careful planning of online learning stages based on the didactic triangle (D. Petko); supporting the idea of a "flipped classroom" where classroom activities are used for interactive and collaborative, experiential, dialogic learning instead of teacher-centered knowledge dissemination (M. Brand, K. Mahlke); basing blended learning on the basis of video lectures developed by using a standardized solution for the entire educational institution (T. Hirmer, A. Henrich); creation of a hybrid campus based on multimodal learning (A. Skulmowski, G. D. Rey); chronological arrangement of the elements of the educational offer for the desired success in education (K. Keller, D. Klinkhammer, E.-M. Rottlaender).
德国实施混合式学习策略的经验
本文通过对2006年至2021年德国科学家科研成果的分析,得出了混合教育在德国推广的激励因素:与最近的教育机构的距离令人难以接受;当地教育机构不能或不愿满足的特殊宗教和语言需求;学习的个体性;避免面对面交流带来的社交问题;巩固教材,增加自主学习时间。强调了高等教育机构的混合式学习策略:考虑到学生的个人偏好,对面对面学习材料进行初步开发,对电子学习材料进行后续开发的策略(J. Dammeier, S. Merten);将同等数量的理论和实践材料以一种清晰、可实施和可衡量的方式结合起来,目的是在面对面学习和电子学习中有目的地发展实践知识,作为混合学习的一部分,(T. Bosch);创建混合学习环境,使学生能够利用电子提交和准备实际工作报告的优势(M. Amelung, D. Rösner);基于教学三角的在线学习阶段精心规划(D. Petko);支持“翻转课堂”的理念,即课堂活动用于互动和协作、体验式和对话式学习,而不是以教师为中心的知识传播(M. Brand, K. Mahlke);在整个教育机构使用标准化解决方案开发的视频讲座的基础上进行混合学习(T. Hirmer, a . Henrich);创建基于多模式学习的混合校园(a . Skulmowski, G. D. Rey);为获得期望的教育成功所提供的教育要素按时间顺序排列(K. Keller, D. Klinkhammer, e . m .)。Rottlaender)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信