{"title":"Economic value of arthropod biological control.","authors":"S. Naranjo, G. Frisvold, Peter C. Ellsworth","doi":"10.1079/9781786393678.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n Overall, biological control (use of natural enemies, such as predators, parasitoids and pathogens) potentially provides among the highest returns on investment available in integrated pest management (IPM) even while estimation of its economic value has received relatively little attention from entomologists, ecologists or economists (Naranjo et al., 2015). The economic value of biological control, and general approaches for its estimation, have been discussed and summarized in several excellent reviews (Headley, 1985; Carlson, 1988; Tisdell, 1990; McFadyen, 1998; Gutierrez et al., 1999; Perkins and Garcia, 1999; Hill and Greathead, 2000; Cullen et al., 2008; Waterfield and Zilberman, 2012; Naranjo et al., 2015). A central tenet in IPM is that pest management strategies should provide for economically efficient and sustainable solutions. Thus, a better understanding of the economic contribution of biological control, as a foundational element of IPM, will help strengthen adoption of this tactic for IPM more generally, and raise its stock among stakeholders and those that invest in this technology both privately and publicly. This chapter aims to build upon the review of Naranjo et al. (2015) by providing more detail on the concepts and methodologies of economic valuation in biological control, to summarize all known projects that have attempted to quantify the economic value of arthropod biological control (with particular focus on introductory and conservation biological control), and to ask how to balance the need for more routine and inclusive economic evaluations with the additional effort needed to spur greater adoption and investment in research and implementation.","PeriodicalId":187132,"journal":{"name":"The economics of integrated pest management of insects","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The economics of integrated pest management of insects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786393678.0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Abstract
Overall, biological control (use of natural enemies, such as predators, parasitoids and pathogens) potentially provides among the highest returns on investment available in integrated pest management (IPM) even while estimation of its economic value has received relatively little attention from entomologists, ecologists or economists (Naranjo et al., 2015). The economic value of biological control, and general approaches for its estimation, have been discussed and summarized in several excellent reviews (Headley, 1985; Carlson, 1988; Tisdell, 1990; McFadyen, 1998; Gutierrez et al., 1999; Perkins and Garcia, 1999; Hill and Greathead, 2000; Cullen et al., 2008; Waterfield and Zilberman, 2012; Naranjo et al., 2015). A central tenet in IPM is that pest management strategies should provide for economically efficient and sustainable solutions. Thus, a better understanding of the economic contribution of biological control, as a foundational element of IPM, will help strengthen adoption of this tactic for IPM more generally, and raise its stock among stakeholders and those that invest in this technology both privately and publicly. This chapter aims to build upon the review of Naranjo et al. (2015) by providing more detail on the concepts and methodologies of economic valuation in biological control, to summarize all known projects that have attempted to quantify the economic value of arthropod biological control (with particular focus on introductory and conservation biological control), and to ask how to balance the need for more routine and inclusive economic evaluations with the additional effort needed to spur greater adoption and investment in research and implementation.
总体而言,生物防治(利用天敌,如捕食者、拟寄生虫和病原体)可能为害虫综合治理(IPM)提供最高的投资回报,尽管昆虫学家、生态学家或经济学家对其经济价值的估计相对较少关注(Naranjo et al., 2015)。生物防治的经济价值及其估计的一般方法已在几篇优秀的评论中进行了讨论和总结(Headley, 1985;卡尔森,1988;Tisdell说,1990;McFadyen, 1998;Gutierrez et al., 1999;Perkins and Garcia, 1999;Hill and Greathead, 2000;Cullen et al., 2008;Waterfield and Zilberman, 2012;Naranjo et al., 2015)。IPM的一个中心原则是有害生物管理战略应提供经济有效和可持续的解决办法。因此,更好地了解生物防治作为IPM的一个基本要素的经济贡献,将有助于加强在IPM中更普遍地采用这一策略,并在利益攸关方和对这一技术进行私人和公共投资的人中间增加其库存。本章旨在以Naranjo等人(2015)的综述为基础,提供更多关于生物控制中经济评估的概念和方法的细节,总结所有试图量化节肢动物生物控制经济价值的已知项目(特别关注介绍性和保护性生物控制)。并询问如何平衡对更常规和更具包容性的经济评估的需求,以及促进更多采用和投资于研究和实施所需的额外努力。