Understanding Robust Target Prediction in Basic Oxygen Furnace

Juhee Bae, G. Mathiason, Yurong Li, N. Kojola, Niclas Ståhl
{"title":"Understanding Robust Target Prediction in Basic Oxygen Furnace","authors":"Juhee Bae, G. Mathiason, Yurong Li, N. Kojola, Niclas Ståhl","doi":"10.1145/3447432.3447435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of using machine learning (ML) to predict the process endpoint for a Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) process used for steelmaking has been largely studied. However, current research often lacks both the usage of a rich dataset and does not address revealing influential factors that explain the process. The process is complex and difficult to control and has a multi-objective target endpoint with a proper range of heat temperature combined with sufficiently low levels of carbon and phosphorus. Reaching this endpoint requires skilled process operators, who are manually controlling the heat throughout the process by using both implicit and explicit control variables in their decisions. Trained ML models can reach good BOF target prediction results, but it is still a challenge to extract the influential factors that are significant to the ML prediction accuracy. Thus, it becomes a challenge to explain and validate an ML prediction model that claims to capture the process well. This paper makes use of a complex and full production dataset to evaluate and compare different approaches for understanding how the data can determine the process target prediction. One approach is based on the collected process data and the other on the ML approach trained on that data to find the influential factors. These complementary approaches aim to explain the BOF process to reveal actionable information on how to improve process control.","PeriodicalId":111736,"journal":{"name":"2021 The 2nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 The 2nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3447432.3447435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of using machine learning (ML) to predict the process endpoint for a Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) process used for steelmaking has been largely studied. However, current research often lacks both the usage of a rich dataset and does not address revealing influential factors that explain the process. The process is complex and difficult to control and has a multi-objective target endpoint with a proper range of heat temperature combined with sufficiently low levels of carbon and phosphorus. Reaching this endpoint requires skilled process operators, who are manually controlling the heat throughout the process by using both implicit and explicit control variables in their decisions. Trained ML models can reach good BOF target prediction results, but it is still a challenge to extract the influential factors that are significant to the ML prediction accuracy. Thus, it becomes a challenge to explain and validate an ML prediction model that claims to capture the process well. This paper makes use of a complex and full production dataset to evaluate and compare different approaches for understanding how the data can determine the process target prediction. One approach is based on the collected process data and the other on the ML approach trained on that data to find the influential factors. These complementary approaches aim to explain the BOF process to reveal actionable information on how to improve process control.
对碱性氧炉鲁棒目标预测的理解
利用机器学习(ML)来预测炼钢用碱性氧炉(BOF)过程终点的问题已经得到了大量的研究。然而,目前的研究往往既缺乏丰富数据集的使用,也没有解决解释这一过程的揭示影响因素。该过程复杂且难以控制,并且具有多目标目标终点,需要适当的热温度范围以及足够低的碳和磷水平。达到这个终点需要熟练的工艺操作人员,他们通过在决策中使用隐式和显式控制变量来手动控制整个过程的热量。经过训练的机器学习模型可以达到较好的BOF目标预测结果,但如何提取对机器学习预测精度有重要影响的因素仍然是一个挑战。因此,解释和验证声称能够很好地捕获过程的ML预测模型成为一个挑战。本文利用一个复杂而完整的生产数据集来评估和比较不同的方法,以了解数据如何确定过程目标预测。一种方法基于收集的过程数据,另一种方法基于对该数据进行训练的ML方法来找到影响因素。这些互补的方法旨在解释转炉过程,揭示如何改进过程控制的可操作信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信