On the Path to Becoming a Teacher: Student Teachers’ Competency in Instructional Planning

N. Yurtseven
{"title":"On the Path to Becoming a Teacher: Student Teachers’ Competency in Instructional Planning","authors":"N. Yurtseven","doi":"10.1080/08878730.2021.1876195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of the study is to examine how the student teachers’ perceptions of instructional planning competency predict their competency in instructional planning. The study was carried out through explanatory mixed method design. The participants of the study included 102 teacher candidates, 65 of whom were female and 37 of whom were male. As quantitative data collection tools, The Scale for Perception of Proficiency in Instruction Planning (SPPIP) developed by Gülbahar and UbD Design Standards Rubric developed by Wiggins and McTighe were used. As qualitative data collection tools, unit plans and focus group interview were used. The quantitative data was analyzed by applying correlational analysis and simple linear regression analysis. The qualitative data was analyzed through content analysis. The regression analysis demonstrate that student teachers’ perceived proficiency in instructional planning explained 57% (R2 = .57) of the competency in instructional planning. As for the qualitative portion of the study, the analysis of collected data revealed three themes regarding student teachers’ views on competency in instructional planning process: factors affecting competency, challenging elements in instructional planning, and strategies to develop competency.","PeriodicalId":349931,"journal":{"name":"The Teacher Educator","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Teacher Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2021.1876195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of the study is to examine how the student teachers’ perceptions of instructional planning competency predict their competency in instructional planning. The study was carried out through explanatory mixed method design. The participants of the study included 102 teacher candidates, 65 of whom were female and 37 of whom were male. As quantitative data collection tools, The Scale for Perception of Proficiency in Instruction Planning (SPPIP) developed by Gülbahar and UbD Design Standards Rubric developed by Wiggins and McTighe were used. As qualitative data collection tools, unit plans and focus group interview were used. The quantitative data was analyzed by applying correlational analysis and simple linear regression analysis. The qualitative data was analyzed through content analysis. The regression analysis demonstrate that student teachers’ perceived proficiency in instructional planning explained 57% (R2 = .57) of the competency in instructional planning. As for the qualitative portion of the study, the analysis of collected data revealed three themes regarding student teachers’ views on competency in instructional planning process: factors affecting competency, challenging elements in instructional planning, and strategies to develop competency.
在成为教师的道路上:学生教师在教学规划中的胜任力
摘要本研究旨在探讨师范生教师对教学计划胜任力的认知如何预测其教学计划胜任力。本研究采用解释混合法设计。该研究的参与者包括102名教师候选人,其中65名女性,37名男性。作为定量数据收集工具,我们使用了g lbahar开发的教学计划熟练度感知量表(SPPIP)和Wiggins和McTighe开发的UbD设计标准量表。定性数据收集工具采用单元计划和焦点小组访谈。采用相关分析和简单线性回归分析对定量数据进行分析。通过内容分析对定性数据进行分析。回归分析显示,实习教师对教学计划的感知熟练程度解释了57%的教学计划胜任力(R2 = 0.57)。在研究的定性部分,对收集到的数据进行分析,揭示了学生教师在教学计划过程中对胜任力的看法的三个主题:影响胜任力的因素、教学计划中的挑战因素和培养胜任力的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信