Contemporary Philosophic-Cognitive Area in Metaphor Research

E. Mikhailova, I. Getskina, A. Abramova, T. N. Kuznetsova
{"title":"Contemporary Philosophic-Cognitive Area in Metaphor Research","authors":"E. Mikhailova, I. Getskina, A. Abramova, T. N. Kuznetsova","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200723.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— The present article considers the approaches of contemporary scientists to metaphor research from the philosophic-cognitive point of view. In contrast to the traditional definition of this trope, the latest metaphor theories by the outstanding philosophers, their distinctive features and significance for science are described and analyzed in this article. Each approach is accompanied with unique examples of the stylistic device in question taken from the works of modern English literature. Each approach reveals a new facet and unique features of this language phenomenon. It should be noted that the theories of outstanding philosophers of the 20th century described above have a solid evidence base, and, therefore, full right to exist. Each of them, in its own way, reveals the essence of metaphor and in its context explains its signs and properties. However, these theories should not be mutually exclusive, but rather complement each other. To limit oneself to only one method of studying a metaphor is the same as looking at the world through a small window and seeing only a small part of it, only a small segment of the horizon, in this case very much can remain beyond the limits of our vision.","PeriodicalId":191967,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization (PELSEG 2020)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization (PELSEG 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200723.046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

— The present article considers the approaches of contemporary scientists to metaphor research from the philosophic-cognitive point of view. In contrast to the traditional definition of this trope, the latest metaphor theories by the outstanding philosophers, their distinctive features and significance for science are described and analyzed in this article. Each approach is accompanied with unique examples of the stylistic device in question taken from the works of modern English literature. Each approach reveals a new facet and unique features of this language phenomenon. It should be noted that the theories of outstanding philosophers of the 20th century described above have a solid evidence base, and, therefore, full right to exist. Each of them, in its own way, reveals the essence of metaphor and in its context explains its signs and properties. However, these theories should not be mutually exclusive, but rather complement each other. To limit oneself to only one method of studying a metaphor is the same as looking at the world through a small window and seeing only a small part of it, only a small segment of the horizon, in this case very much can remain beyond the limits of our vision.
当代哲学隐喻研究的认知领域
本文从哲学认知的角度考察了当代科学家隐喻研究的方法。本文对比了这一隐喻的传统定义,阐述和分析了杰出哲学家的最新隐喻理论及其特点和科学意义。每一种方法都伴随着现代英国文学作品中所讨论的独特的文体手段的例子。每种方法都揭示了这种语言现象的一个新的方面和独特的特征。应该指出的是,上述20世纪杰出哲学家的理论有坚实的证据基础,因此有充分的存在权利。它们都以自己的方式揭示了隐喻的本质,并在其语境中解释了隐喻的符号和属性。然而,这些理论不应该相互排斥,而应该相互补充。把自己局限于一种研究隐喻的方法,就像透过一扇小窗户看世界,只看到它的一小部分,只看到地平线的一小部分,在这种情况下,很多东西都超出了我们的视野范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信