Retention Learning of Students in Machine Language: What can Culturo-Techno-Contextual Approach (CTCA) do?

M. Adewusi, Tokunbo Odekeye, F. Undiyaundeye, Silas Eniola Egbowon, Mukaila A. Rahman, O. Akindoju
{"title":"Retention Learning of Students in Machine Language: What can Culturo-Techno-Contextual Approach (CTCA) do?","authors":"M. Adewusi, Tokunbo Odekeye, F. Undiyaundeye, Silas Eniola Egbowon, Mukaila A. Rahman, O. Akindoju","doi":"10.59568/kjed-2023-3-1-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the difference between (a) the retention of information by students taught machine learning using the culturo-techno-contextual approach (CTCA) and the lecture method; (b) the retention of information by male and female students taught machine learning using CTCA; and (c) the interaction effects of gender and the teaching methods on the retention of information by students taught machine learning using CTCA and lecture. Adopted learning ideas include Vygotsky's theory of constructivism, Ausubel's philosophy of meaningful learning, and the philosophical framework of the CTCA. This study employed sequential explanatory mixed methodologies and a quasi-experimental research methodology. A total of 138 learners in senior secondary II participated in the study. The reliability of the Machine Language Achievement Test (MLAT) was determined using the split-half method, which yielded a Spearman-Brown coefficient of 0.80. There is a statistically significant difference in method of teaching [F (1, 137) = 111.61; p<0.05], which was in favour of the CTCA group (experimental). There is no statistically significant difference in the gender of the students in the experimental group [F (1, 137) = 0.08; p > 0.05]. The interaction effect of methods and gender is not statistically significant [F (1, 137) = 1.61; p = 0.21]. We therefore encouraged and suggested that secondary school computer studies teachers should utilise CTCA in order to improve student learning.","PeriodicalId":176201,"journal":{"name":"Kampala International University Journal of Education","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kampala International University Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59568/kjed-2023-3-1-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the difference between (a) the retention of information by students taught machine learning using the culturo-techno-contextual approach (CTCA) and the lecture method; (b) the retention of information by male and female students taught machine learning using CTCA; and (c) the interaction effects of gender and the teaching methods on the retention of information by students taught machine learning using CTCA and lecture. Adopted learning ideas include Vygotsky's theory of constructivism, Ausubel's philosophy of meaningful learning, and the philosophical framework of the CTCA. This study employed sequential explanatory mixed methodologies and a quasi-experimental research methodology. A total of 138 learners in senior secondary II participated in the study. The reliability of the Machine Language Achievement Test (MLAT) was determined using the split-half method, which yielded a Spearman-Brown coefficient of 0.80. There is a statistically significant difference in method of teaching [F (1, 137) = 111.61; p<0.05], which was in favour of the CTCA group (experimental). There is no statistically significant difference in the gender of the students in the experimental group [F (1, 137) = 0.08; p > 0.05]. The interaction effect of methods and gender is not statistically significant [F (1, 137) = 1.61; p = 0.21]. We therefore encouraged and suggested that secondary school computer studies teachers should utilise CTCA in order to improve student learning.
机器语言学生的记忆学习:文化-技术-语境方法(CTCA)能做什么?
本研究旨在确定(a)使用文化-技术-上下文方法(CTCA)和讲座方法教授机器学习的学生对信息的保留;(b)使用CTCA教授机器学习的男女学生对信息的保留;(c)性别和教学方法对使用CTCA和讲座进行机器学习的学生记忆信息的交互影响。采用的学习理念包括维果茨基的建构主义理论、奥苏贝尔的有意义学习哲学以及CTCA的哲学框架。本研究采用序贯解释混合方法和准实验研究方法。共有138名高中二年级学生参与了本研究。机器语言成就测试(MLAT)的信度采用分半法确定,其Spearman-Brown系数为0.80。教学方法差异有统计学意义[F (1,137) = 111.61;p 0.05)。方法与性别的交互效应无统计学意义[F (1,137) = 1.61;P = 0.21]。因此,我们鼓励和建议中学计算机教师利用CTCA来改善学生的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信