Pravična tranzicija energetike Srbije – održivost reformi u uslovima nove globalne krize

Petar Đukić
{"title":"Pravična tranzicija energetike Srbije – održivost reformi u uslovima nove globalne krize","authors":"Petar Đukić","doi":"10.46793/eee22-3.53d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accomplished results of the energy transition in Serbia are in big delay, in comparison to the relevant countries in Europe and the world. Energy sector is the biggest anthropogenic factor of air pollution in Serbia, as much as all damaging emissions. Serbian climate action and green agenda have to start from the energetics. The majority of Serbian citizens are aware of that, but there are not enough organised public efforts for the structural changes in the big public companies and institutional system in the energy sector. Regardless how much updated, the environmental standards, programs and the strategies will not be efficient unless we put systematic work of designing one socially acceptable model for structural reform of the energy sector. Energy transition in today’s world is the process that leads to the rapid decarbonisation and “greening” of energy systems, in the way that permanently increases economic performances and energy efficiency, as well as one social sustainable and controlled process of the institutional changes. Serbia belongs to the group of the “leading” countries towards coal participation in electricity power production, as much as in the energy mix. Therefore, transformation and distribution loses, especially those in the electricity sector are unacceptably high. That is why it is necessary to undertake a systematic discussion about basic contents of one just and socially sustainable model of energy transition. Some foreign experiences, especially Czech Hungarian, Polish, Rumanian, Greek and Bulgarian could be useful, but it should not be enough. Large debate needs to be conducted behind the level of political confrontations, including all interested parties. The independent experts, representatives of employed in energy companies, union activists, as much as actual administration and management, citizens depending of energy companies, students and NGOs on the local and national level, all should be included in this dispute. On the level of the national executive authority and legislative power, it should be constituted one advisory body, that could strategically deal with acceptable solutions of just energy transition and its monitoring in Serbia, at list for the next two or three decades.","PeriodicalId":236996,"journal":{"name":"Energija, ekonomija, ekologija","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energija, ekonomija, ekologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/eee22-3.53d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The accomplished results of the energy transition in Serbia are in big delay, in comparison to the relevant countries in Europe and the world. Energy sector is the biggest anthropogenic factor of air pollution in Serbia, as much as all damaging emissions. Serbian climate action and green agenda have to start from the energetics. The majority of Serbian citizens are aware of that, but there are not enough organised public efforts for the structural changes in the big public companies and institutional system in the energy sector. Regardless how much updated, the environmental standards, programs and the strategies will not be efficient unless we put systematic work of designing one socially acceptable model for structural reform of the energy sector. Energy transition in today’s world is the process that leads to the rapid decarbonisation and “greening” of energy systems, in the way that permanently increases economic performances and energy efficiency, as well as one social sustainable and controlled process of the institutional changes. Serbia belongs to the group of the “leading” countries towards coal participation in electricity power production, as much as in the energy mix. Therefore, transformation and distribution loses, especially those in the electricity sector are unacceptably high. That is why it is necessary to undertake a systematic discussion about basic contents of one just and socially sustainable model of energy transition. Some foreign experiences, especially Czech Hungarian, Polish, Rumanian, Greek and Bulgarian could be useful, but it should not be enough. Large debate needs to be conducted behind the level of political confrontations, including all interested parties. The independent experts, representatives of employed in energy companies, union activists, as much as actual administration and management, citizens depending of energy companies, students and NGOs on the local and national level, all should be included in this dispute. On the level of the national executive authority and legislative power, it should be constituted one advisory body, that could strategically deal with acceptable solutions of just energy transition and its monitoring in Serbia, at list for the next two or three decades.
与欧洲和世界有关国家相比,塞尔维亚能源转型取得成果的时间较晚。能源部门是塞尔维亚空气污染的最大人为因素,与所有破坏性排放一样多。塞尔维亚的气候行动和绿色议程必须从能源学开始。大多数塞尔维亚公民都意识到这一点,但在大型上市公司和能源部门的体制体系中,没有足够的有组织的公众努力进行结构性改革。除非我们系统地设计一种社会可以接受的能源部门结构改革模式,否则无论更新多少,环境标准、项目和战略都不会有效。当今世界的能源转型是导致能源系统快速脱碳和“绿色化”的过程,以永久提高经济绩效和能源效率的方式,也是一个社会可持续和可控的制度变革过程。塞尔维亚属于煤炭参与电力生产和能源结构的“领先”国家集团。因此,转换和分配损失,特别是电力部门的损失高得令人无法接受。这就是为什么有必要对一个公正和社会可持续的能源转型模式的基本内容进行系统的讨论。一些外国经验,特别是捷克、匈牙利、波兰、罗马尼亚、希腊和保加利亚的经验可能有用,但这还不够。在政治对抗的背后,需要进行大规模的辩论,包括所有有关各方。独立专家、能源公司雇员代表、工会积极分子、实际行政和管理人员、能源公司的居民、学生、地方和国家层面的非政府组织都应该参与到这场争论中来。在国家行政当局和立法权一级,它应组成一个咨询机构,能够战略性地处理可接受的公正能源过渡的解决办法,并在今后二三十年监测塞尔维亚的能源过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信