Comparison of two approaches to a positional servo control

I. Bélai, M. Huba
{"title":"Comparison of two approaches to a positional servo control","authors":"I. Bélai, M. Huba","doi":"10.1109/CARPATHIANCC.2014.6843565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with comparison of a filtered disturbance observer based PID control (DO FPID) with different realizations of a two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) PID control. It shows that whereas in terms of IAE (Integral of absolute error) of the setpoint and disturbance step responses, both solutions may yield an equivalent closed loop dynamics, the DO FPID control guarantees a much better quantization noise attenuation [1]-[3]. It is shown that this property may be used in such a way that whereas the torque ripple of both alternatives evaluated by a modified total variance measure takes equivalent values, IAE values of the loop with the DO-FPID will significantly decrease.","PeriodicalId":105920,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 15th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC)","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 15th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CARPATHIANCC.2014.6843565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The paper deals with comparison of a filtered disturbance observer based PID control (DO FPID) with different realizations of a two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) PID control. It shows that whereas in terms of IAE (Integral of absolute error) of the setpoint and disturbance step responses, both solutions may yield an equivalent closed loop dynamics, the DO FPID control guarantees a much better quantization noise attenuation [1]-[3]. It is shown that this property may be used in such a way that whereas the torque ripple of both alternatives evaluated by a modified total variance measure takes equivalent values, IAE values of the loop with the DO-FPID will significantly decrease.
位置伺服控制两种方法的比较
本文比较了基于滤波扰动观测器的PID控制与两自由度PID控制的不同实现方式。结果表明,对于定值和扰动阶跃响应的IAE(绝对误差积分),两种方案都可以产生等效的闭环动态,而DO FPID控制保证了更好的量化噪声衰减[1]-[3]。结果表明,这一特性可以这样使用,尽管通过改进的总方差度量评估的两种备选方案的转矩脉动取等效值,但带有DO-FPID的环路的IAE值将显着降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信