American Federalism and Covid-19

J. Kincaid, J. Leckrone
{"title":"American Federalism and Covid-19","authors":"J. Kincaid, J. Leckrone","doi":"10.4324/9781003166771-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States has a dualist federal system where the states delegated limited power to the federal government. Public health is largely reserved to the states, although the federal government can regulate foreign and interstate travel and commerce, as well as provide financial and scientific assistance to the states. States’ governors and many local-government executives responded to the Covid-19 pandemic with different combinations of mitigation policies, including stay-at-home orders, masking requirements, self-quarantine, and variations on permitted business activity. The federal government limited foreign travel, provided public health recommendations, aided private companies in vaccine development, and provided unprecedented financial assistance to fight the pandemic and stimulate the economy. President Donald Trump did not have authority to mandate a national mitigation strategy. However, he did not use his informal powers to coordinate with governors to create a more unified approach to Covid-19. He, along with most Republican governors and members of Congress, focused more on economic recovery, while Democratic officials focused more on controlling the virus. This partisan polarisation, and Trump’s lack of intergovernmental leadership, rather than the federal structure itself, prevented the United States from having a stronger response to Covid-19. The pandemic response has not resulted in any significant changes in the federal structure. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.","PeriodicalId":130880,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003166771-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States has a dualist federal system where the states delegated limited power to the federal government. Public health is largely reserved to the states, although the federal government can regulate foreign and interstate travel and commerce, as well as provide financial and scientific assistance to the states. States’ governors and many local-government executives responded to the Covid-19 pandemic with different combinations of mitigation policies, including stay-at-home orders, masking requirements, self-quarantine, and variations on permitted business activity. The federal government limited foreign travel, provided public health recommendations, aided private companies in vaccine development, and provided unprecedented financial assistance to fight the pandemic and stimulate the economy. President Donald Trump did not have authority to mandate a national mitigation strategy. However, he did not use his informal powers to coordinate with governors to create a more unified approach to Covid-19. He, along with most Republican governors and members of Congress, focused more on economic recovery, while Democratic officials focused more on controlling the virus. This partisan polarisation, and Trump’s lack of intergovernmental leadership, rather than the federal structure itself, prevented the United States from having a stronger response to Covid-19. The pandemic response has not resulted in any significant changes in the federal structure. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.
美国联邦制与新冠肺炎
美国实行二元联邦制,各州将有限的权力下放给联邦政府。公共卫生主要由各州负责,尽管联邦政府可以管理国外和州际旅行和商业,并向各州提供财政和科学援助。各州州长和许多地方政府高管以不同的缓解政策组合来应对Covid-19大流行,包括居家令、口罩要求、自我隔离以及允许的商业活动的变化。联邦政府限制出国旅行,提供公共卫生建议,帮助私营公司开发疫苗,并为抗击疫情和刺激经济提供前所未有的财政援助。唐纳德·特朗普总统无权下令制定一项国家缓解战略。然而,他没有利用自己的非正式权力与州长协调,以制定一种更统一的方法来应对Covid-19。与大多数共和党州长和国会议员一样,他更关注经济复苏,而民主党官员则更关注控制病毒。这种党派分化,加上特朗普缺乏政府间领导,而不是联邦结构本身,阻碍了美国对Covid-19做出更强有力的反应。大流行应对措施并未导致联邦结构发生任何重大变化。©2022选择和编辑事项,Nico Steytler。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信