Assessment of defect prediction models using machine learning techniques for object-oriented systems

R. Malhotra, Shivani Shukla, Geet Sawhney
{"title":"Assessment of defect prediction models using machine learning techniques for object-oriented systems","authors":"R. Malhotra, Shivani Shukla, Geet Sawhney","doi":"10.1109/ICRITO.2016.7785021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software development is an essential field today. The advancement in software systems leads to risk of them being exposed to defects. It is important to predict the defects well in advance in order to help the researchers and developers to build cost effective and reliable software. Defect prediction models extract information about the software from its past releases and predict the occurrence of defects in future releases. A number of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms proposed and used in the literature to efficiently develop defect prediction models. What is required is the comparison of these ML techniques to quantify the advantage in performance of using a particular technique over another. This study scrutinizes and compares the performances of 17 ML techniques on the selected datasets to find the ML technique which gives the best performance for determining defect prone classes in an Object-Oriented(OO) software. Also, the superiority of the best ML technique is statistically evaluated. The result of this study demonstrates the predictive capability of ML techniques and advocates the use of Bagging as the best ML technique for defect prediction.","PeriodicalId":377611,"journal":{"name":"2016 5th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 5th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO.2016.7785021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Software development is an essential field today. The advancement in software systems leads to risk of them being exposed to defects. It is important to predict the defects well in advance in order to help the researchers and developers to build cost effective and reliable software. Defect prediction models extract information about the software from its past releases and predict the occurrence of defects in future releases. A number of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms proposed and used in the literature to efficiently develop defect prediction models. What is required is the comparison of these ML techniques to quantify the advantage in performance of using a particular technique over another. This study scrutinizes and compares the performances of 17 ML techniques on the selected datasets to find the ML technique which gives the best performance for determining defect prone classes in an Object-Oriented(OO) software. Also, the superiority of the best ML technique is statistically evaluated. The result of this study demonstrates the predictive capability of ML techniques and advocates the use of Bagging as the best ML technique for defect prediction.
使用面向对象系统的机器学习技术评估缺陷预测模型
软件开发是当今的一个重要领域。软件系统的进步导致它们暴露于缺陷的风险。为了帮助研究人员和开发人员构建具有成本效益和可靠性的软件,提前很好地预测缺陷是非常重要的。缺陷预测模型从过去的版本中提取有关软件的信息,并预测未来版本中缺陷的发生。文献中提出并使用了许多机器学习算法来有效地开发缺陷预测模型。所需要的是对这些ML技术进行比较,以量化使用特定技术优于另一种技术的性能优势。本研究仔细检查并比较了17种ML技术在选定数据集上的性能,以找到在面向对象(OO)软件中确定容易出现缺陷的类的最佳性能的ML技术。同时,对最佳机器学习技术的优越性进行了统计评价。本研究的结果证明了机器学习技术的预测能力,并主张使用Bagging作为最佳的机器学习技术进行缺陷预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信