Finite Element Analysis and Investigation of Critical Impact Point of Steel Guardrails Affecting Safety and Structural Performance

Sedat Ozcanan
{"title":"Finite Element Analysis and Investigation of Critical Impact Point of Steel Guardrails Affecting Safety and Structural Performance","authors":"Sedat Ozcanan","doi":"10.18400/tjce.1238657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the guardrails are designed, the structural adequacy and safety criteria are determined by the relevant standards and full-scale crash tests. One of the widely used standards is European Norm 1317 (EN1317). Guardrail systems generally consist of rails and posts. The guardrails are more rigid around the posts, which are mounted on the ground or embedded in soil at certain intervals. Therefore, it is important for driver/passenger and roadside safety to determine the most critical point in terms of structural and safety performance and design according to the most unfavorable situation. With this motivation, in this study, the effect of different impact points on the structural and safety performance of the H1W4 guardrail was investigated by finite element (FE) analysis. For this purpose, first of all, the finite element models of the H1W4-A system were calibrated and validated with real crash test data. Then, with the help of the validated models, analyses were completed for different impact points as 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 meters with a half-meter difference for the standard 2-meter post spacing. In the light of the measured safety parameters such as Acceleration Severity Index (ASI), Theoretical Head Impact Velocity (THIV) and structural performance criteria such as working width (W) and exit angle (α), the critical impact point for the guardrail was determined. Contrary to what is generally known, crashing vehicles into flexible points (0.5 and 1.0 m) rather than impacting rigid points (1.5 and 2.0 m) creates a more negative situation in crash tests.","PeriodicalId":241324,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18400/tjce.1238657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the guardrails are designed, the structural adequacy and safety criteria are determined by the relevant standards and full-scale crash tests. One of the widely used standards is European Norm 1317 (EN1317). Guardrail systems generally consist of rails and posts. The guardrails are more rigid around the posts, which are mounted on the ground or embedded in soil at certain intervals. Therefore, it is important for driver/passenger and roadside safety to determine the most critical point in terms of structural and safety performance and design according to the most unfavorable situation. With this motivation, in this study, the effect of different impact points on the structural and safety performance of the H1W4 guardrail was investigated by finite element (FE) analysis. For this purpose, first of all, the finite element models of the H1W4-A system were calibrated and validated with real crash test data. Then, with the help of the validated models, analyses were completed for different impact points as 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 meters with a half-meter difference for the standard 2-meter post spacing. In the light of the measured safety parameters such as Acceleration Severity Index (ASI), Theoretical Head Impact Velocity (THIV) and structural performance criteria such as working width (W) and exit angle (α), the critical impact point for the guardrail was determined. Contrary to what is generally known, crashing vehicles into flexible points (0.5 and 1.0 m) rather than impacting rigid points (1.5 and 2.0 m) creates a more negative situation in crash tests.
钢护栏影响安全与结构性能的临界冲击点有限元分析与研究
护栏设计完成后,通过相关标准和全尺寸碰撞试验确定结构的充分性和安全性标准。其中一个广泛使用的标准是欧洲标准1317 (EN1317)。护栏系统一般由栏杆和柱子组成。护栏在柱子周围比较刚性,每隔一定的间隔安装在地面上或埋入泥土中。因此,根据最不利的情况,确定结构和安全性能的最临界点,并进行设计,对于驾驶员/乘客和道路安全至关重要。基于此,本研究采用有限元分析方法,研究了不同碰撞点对H1W4型护栏结构及安全性能的影响。为此,首先对H1W4-A系统的有限元模型进行标定,并用真实碰撞试验数据进行验证。然后,在验证模型的帮助下,对0.5、1.0、1.5和2.0米的不同冲击点进行了分析,标准2米柱间距相差半米。根据实测的加速度严重指数(ASI)、理论头部撞击速度(THIV)等安全参数和工作宽度(W)、出口角(α)等结构性能指标,确定了护栏的临界撞击点。与通常所知的相反,在碰撞测试中,将车辆撞向柔性点(0.5和1.0米)而不是撞击刚性点(1.5和2.0米)会产生更负面的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信