The Relationship Between the COVID-19 Pandemic and Burnout Among the Healthcare Team

Allison McNeely, Megan Tobins, A. Mitchell
{"title":"The Relationship Between the COVID-19 Pandemic and Burnout Among the Healthcare Team","authors":"Allison McNeely, Megan Tobins, A. Mitchell","doi":"10.33425/2639-9474.1215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant challenges physically and emotionally for healthcare workers. Frontline workers treating COVID-19 patients have battled stressful work environments, high patient mortality, lack of personal protective equipment (PPE), and feelings of exhaustion and powerlessness. This research study explored the relationship that COVID-19 has had on employees’ feelings and attitudes regarding their job. Methods: This quantitative research project took pace in an Emergency Department in Boston, MA. The paper questionnaire contained demographic questions and the Maslach Burnout Inventory was used as a guide. The variables that were examined were gender, age, number of years working in the emergency department, job category, and marital status. This tool was designed to measure burnout among human service professionals. The inventory contains three scales; emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment, and contains 22 questions that are rated on a seven-point scale from never to every day. The emotional exhaustion section contains nine questions and reflects fatigue or stress. Depersonalization contains five questions and refers to feelings of callousness or indifference in regard to recipients, i.e. patients. Personal accomplishment contains eight questions and examines feelings of enthusiasm and effectiveness. The overall aim of the survey was to determine the relationship the COVID-19 pandemic had on employee burnout. Sample: A convenience sampling of all employees in one emergency department in the Boston area were recruited for this study. A total of 110 participants were recruited through word of mouth during shift huddles, as well as, during rounds on the unit with the team. The survey was open to all employees who worked in the emergency department, without regard to job title. Responses remained anonymous, participants were informed that their responses were used for an academic research project, and that they could not withdraw from the study once they had completed the survey as it was anonymous. Data Collection: The tool was administered to physicians, physician assistants, nurses, advanced care providers, medical assistants, social workers, and security officers in the emergency department in a hospital located in in Boston, Massachusetts. The variables that were examined were gender, age, number of years working in the emergency department, job category, and marital status. Once the surveys were collected, an excel spreadsheet was developed and the data analyzed. The results were disseminated to the nurse manager and posted on the bulletin board on the unit. All data that was collected in this research study has been securely stored in the lead researcher’s office for the next three years. Results: Those who had worked in the emergency department greater than 10 years scored higher than their counterparts on emotional exhaustion (11.8%), depersonalization (25.4%), and lack of personal achievement (17.2%). Female scores revealed higher levels of burnout compared to males. Single participants scored higher levels of burnout. Lastly, nurses scored higher on burnout followed by ESA’s (assistants). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant changes in healthcare resulting in higher stress levels, fatigue, and burnout among healthcare workers. COVID-19 will continue to evolve as will healthcare. Further education and research is essential to prevent future pandemics that lead to crisis situations that could exacerbate future burnout in the healthcare industry. Adequate preparation for future pandemic situations could play a key role in prevention of burnout among healthcare teams.","PeriodicalId":158343,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Primary Care","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9474.1215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant challenges physically and emotionally for healthcare workers. Frontline workers treating COVID-19 patients have battled stressful work environments, high patient mortality, lack of personal protective equipment (PPE), and feelings of exhaustion and powerlessness. This research study explored the relationship that COVID-19 has had on employees’ feelings and attitudes regarding their job. Methods: This quantitative research project took pace in an Emergency Department in Boston, MA. The paper questionnaire contained demographic questions and the Maslach Burnout Inventory was used as a guide. The variables that were examined were gender, age, number of years working in the emergency department, job category, and marital status. This tool was designed to measure burnout among human service professionals. The inventory contains three scales; emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment, and contains 22 questions that are rated on a seven-point scale from never to every day. The emotional exhaustion section contains nine questions and reflects fatigue or stress. Depersonalization contains five questions and refers to feelings of callousness or indifference in regard to recipients, i.e. patients. Personal accomplishment contains eight questions and examines feelings of enthusiasm and effectiveness. The overall aim of the survey was to determine the relationship the COVID-19 pandemic had on employee burnout. Sample: A convenience sampling of all employees in one emergency department in the Boston area were recruited for this study. A total of 110 participants were recruited through word of mouth during shift huddles, as well as, during rounds on the unit with the team. The survey was open to all employees who worked in the emergency department, without regard to job title. Responses remained anonymous, participants were informed that their responses were used for an academic research project, and that they could not withdraw from the study once they had completed the survey as it was anonymous. Data Collection: The tool was administered to physicians, physician assistants, nurses, advanced care providers, medical assistants, social workers, and security officers in the emergency department in a hospital located in in Boston, Massachusetts. The variables that were examined were gender, age, number of years working in the emergency department, job category, and marital status. Once the surveys were collected, an excel spreadsheet was developed and the data analyzed. The results were disseminated to the nurse manager and posted on the bulletin board on the unit. All data that was collected in this research study has been securely stored in the lead researcher’s office for the next three years. Results: Those who had worked in the emergency department greater than 10 years scored higher than their counterparts on emotional exhaustion (11.8%), depersonalization (25.4%), and lack of personal achievement (17.2%). Female scores revealed higher levels of burnout compared to males. Single participants scored higher levels of burnout. Lastly, nurses scored higher on burnout followed by ESA’s (assistants). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant changes in healthcare resulting in higher stress levels, fatigue, and burnout among healthcare workers. COVID-19 will continue to evolve as will healthcare. Further education and research is essential to prevent future pandemics that lead to crisis situations that could exacerbate future burnout in the healthcare industry. Adequate preparation for future pandemic situations could play a key role in prevention of burnout among healthcare teams.
COVID-19大流行与医疗团队倦怠的关系
2019冠状病毒病大流行给医护人员带来了身体和情感上的重大挑战。治疗COVID-19患者的一线工作人员面临着工作环境紧张、患者死亡率高、缺乏个人防护装备以及疲惫和无力感的挑战。本研究探讨了COVID-19对员工对工作的感受和态度的关系。方法:这个定量研究项目在马萨诸塞州波士顿的急诊科进行。纸质问卷包含人口学问题,并使用Maslach职业倦怠量表作为指南。研究的变量包括性别、年龄、在急诊科工作的年数、工作类别和婚姻状况。该工具旨在测量人力服务专业人员的职业倦怠。该量表包含三个量表;情绪衰竭,人格解体,个人成就,包含22个问题,从从不到每天都分为7个等级。情绪衰竭部分有9个问题,反映疲劳或压力。人格解体包含五个问题,涉及对接受者(即患者)的麻木不仁或冷漠的感觉。个人成就包含八个问题,考察热情和效率的感受。调查的总体目的是确定COVID-19大流行与员工倦怠的关系。样本:本研究招募了波士顿地区一家急诊科的所有员工。总共有110名参与者是在轮班会议期间通过口口相传的方式招募的,以及在与团队一起在单位进行查房时招募的。这项调查对所有在急诊科工作的员工开放,不分职位。回答是匿名的,参与者被告知他们的回答是用于一个学术研究项目,一旦他们完成了调查,他们就不能退出研究,因为这是匿名的。数据收集:该工具被用于马萨诸塞州波士顿一家医院急诊科的医生、医师助理、护士、高级护理提供者、医疗助理、社会工作者和保安人员。研究的变量包括性别、年龄、在急诊科工作的年数、工作类别和婚姻状况。一旦调查被收集,一个excel电子表格被开发和数据分析。结果被分发给护士经理,并张贴在病房的公告栏上。在接下来的三年里,所有在这项研究中收集到的数据都被安全地存储在首席研究员的办公室里。结果:在急诊科工作10年以上的患者在情绪衰竭(11.8%)、人格解体(25.4%)和个人成就感缺乏(17.2%)方面得分高于同行。与男性相比,女性的得分显示出更高的倦怠程度。单身参与者的倦怠程度更高。最后,护士在职业倦怠方面得分较高,其次是助理。结论:2019冠状病毒病大流行导致医疗保健发生重大变化,导致医护人员的压力水平升高、疲劳和倦怠。COVID-19将继续发展,医疗保健也将继续发展。进一步的教育和研究对于预防未来的流行病至关重要,这种流行病可能导致危机局势,从而加剧医疗保健行业未来的倦怠。为未来的大流行情况做好充分准备,可以在预防保健团队的倦怠方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信