Mist removal performance of a novel electrostatic precipitation type mist eliminator with a narrow gap at high velocity for coal-fired power plant

Hak-Joon Kim, Jin-Seon Kim, B. Han, Yong-Jin Kim
{"title":"Mist removal performance of a novel electrostatic precipitation type mist eliminator with a narrow gap at high velocity for coal-fired power plant","authors":"Hak-Joon Kim, Jin-Seon Kim, B. Han, Yong-Jin Kim","doi":"10.1109/IAS.2019.8912001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To remove fine particles from a wet FGD (Flue gas desulfurization) in coal-fired thermal power plants, we developed a flat-plate type wet electrostatic mist eliminator (EME) with narrow gap and high gas velocity, compared to conventional electrostatic precipitation (ESP) design for the thermal power plants. The particle collection and pressure drop performance tests of the lab scale EME having single channel geometry with a collection area of 0.5 m2 were conducted at various gas velocities and applied voltages, and also compared to those with the Chevron type mist eliminator. The pilot scale EME designed from the lab scale with collection area (4.6 m2) was tested at a fixed velocity of 4 m/s with and without the Chevron type ME, and its long term performance was evaluated for approximate 400 minutes. Mists smaller than $\\mathbf{10}\\ \\mu \\mathbf{m}$ including CaCO3 were generated and an optical particle counter and EPA test method 5 were used to measure particle collection efficiency and emission concentration. Experimental results showed that collection efficiency of the lab scale EME at 4 m/s was approximately 3 times higher than that with the Chevron type, while pressure drop was only 8% of it. Particle emission from the pilot scale EME with multiple channels was 2 mg/m3 and decreased to 1.4 mg/m3 when it combined with the Chevron. Even though the initial particle collection efficiency of the pilot scale EME, 71.2%, was decreased to 60.5%, the efficiency was recovered almost to the initial state after 10 min water cleaning with 43.5 L/min.","PeriodicalId":376719,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.2019.8912001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

To remove fine particles from a wet FGD (Flue gas desulfurization) in coal-fired thermal power plants, we developed a flat-plate type wet electrostatic mist eliminator (EME) with narrow gap and high gas velocity, compared to conventional electrostatic precipitation (ESP) design for the thermal power plants. The particle collection and pressure drop performance tests of the lab scale EME having single channel geometry with a collection area of 0.5 m2 were conducted at various gas velocities and applied voltages, and also compared to those with the Chevron type mist eliminator. The pilot scale EME designed from the lab scale with collection area (4.6 m2) was tested at a fixed velocity of 4 m/s with and without the Chevron type ME, and its long term performance was evaluated for approximate 400 minutes. Mists smaller than $\mathbf{10}\ \mu \mathbf{m}$ including CaCO3 were generated and an optical particle counter and EPA test method 5 were used to measure particle collection efficiency and emission concentration. Experimental results showed that collection efficiency of the lab scale EME at 4 m/s was approximately 3 times higher than that with the Chevron type, while pressure drop was only 8% of it. Particle emission from the pilot scale EME with multiple channels was 2 mg/m3 and decreased to 1.4 mg/m3 when it combined with the Chevron. Even though the initial particle collection efficiency of the pilot scale EME, 71.2%, was decreased to 60.5%, the efficiency was recovered almost to the initial state after 10 min water cleaning with 43.5 L/min.
燃煤电厂新型窄间隙静电沉降式高速除雾器的除雾性能
为了去除燃煤火电厂湿式烟气脱硫中的细颗粒物,与传统的电除尘器设计相比,研制了一种窄间隙、高气速的平板式湿式静电除雾器。在不同的气体速度和施加电压下,对收集面积为0.5 m2的单通道几何形状的实验室规模EME进行了颗粒收集和压降性能测试,并与雪佛龙型除雾器进行了比较。在实验室规模设计的具有收集面积(4.6 m2)的中试规模EME,在有或没有Chevron型EME的情况下,以4 m/s的固定速度进行测试,并对其长期性能进行了约400分钟的评估。生成包含CaCO3的小于$\mathbf{10}\ \mu \mathbf{m}$的雾,使用光学粒子计数器和EPA测试方法5测量粒子收集效率和排放浓度。实验结果表明,在4m /s的速度下,实验室规模的EME的收集效率比Chevron型提高了约3倍,而压降仅为其8%。中试规模多通道EME的颗粒排放量为2 mg/m3,与Chevron组合后降低至1.4 mg/m3。中试EME的初始颗粒收集效率从71.2%下降到60.5%,但以43.5 L/min的速度水洗10 min后,效率基本恢复到初始状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信