An Aristotelian Resistance Against Transhumanism

Emanuele Martinelli
{"title":"An Aristotelian Resistance Against Transhumanism","authors":"Emanuele Martinelli","doi":"10.55613/jeet.v32i1.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Posthuman Bliss? The Failed Promise of Transhumanism by Susan B. Levin presents a well-informed and structured critique to transhumanism. Not only transhumanist ethical and sociopo-litical applications are challenged: the theoretical assumptions and implications of transhumanism are made explicit and put into discussion, thereby confronting transhumanism as a worldview of its own, from metaphysics, to epistemology, to philosophy of mind, down to ethics and politics. This worldview is then constantly put to the test of Levin’s own Aristotelian essentialist framework, which sees the human being as a holistic whole and our role in the world as the complex process of attaining human flourishing. First, I will spend a few words to frame the general aim of the book and to delineate the main contents of the seven chapters. After that, I will deal critically with four interesting focal points, where further research may be prompted or the standpoint of the author may be challenged: the attribution of (rational) essentialism to transhumanism, the definition of well-being underlying transhumanist positions, the apparent tension between the sociopolitical im-plications of transhumanism and its cultivation of radical personal autonomy, the critical evaluation of Levin’s American-centered adaptation of her Aristotelian virtue-ethics approach.","PeriodicalId":157018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v32i1.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Posthuman Bliss? The Failed Promise of Transhumanism by Susan B. Levin presents a well-informed and structured critique to transhumanism. Not only transhumanist ethical and sociopo-litical applications are challenged: the theoretical assumptions and implications of transhumanism are made explicit and put into discussion, thereby confronting transhumanism as a worldview of its own, from metaphysics, to epistemology, to philosophy of mind, down to ethics and politics. This worldview is then constantly put to the test of Levin’s own Aristotelian essentialist framework, which sees the human being as a holistic whole and our role in the world as the complex process of attaining human flourishing. First, I will spend a few words to frame the general aim of the book and to delineate the main contents of the seven chapters. After that, I will deal critically with four interesting focal points, where further research may be prompted or the standpoint of the author may be challenged: the attribution of (rational) essentialism to transhumanism, the definition of well-being underlying transhumanist positions, the apparent tension between the sociopolitical im-plications of transhumanism and its cultivation of radical personal autonomy, the critical evaluation of Levin’s American-centered adaptation of her Aristotelian virtue-ethics approach.
亚里士多德对超人类主义的抵抗
后人类幸福吗?苏珊·b·莱文的《超人类主义失败的承诺》对超人类主义进行了全面而有条理的批判。不仅超人类主义的伦理和社会政治应用受到了挑战:超人类主义的理论假设和含义被明确地提出并进行了讨论,从而将超人类主义作为一种自己的世界观,从形而上学到认识论,到心灵哲学,再到伦理和政治。然后,这种世界观不断受到莱文自己的亚里士多德本质主义框架的考验。亚里士多德本质主义框架认为,人类是一个整体,我们在世界上的角色是实现人类繁荣的复杂过程。首先,我将花几句话来框架这本书的总目标和描绘七章的主要内容。之后,我将批判性地处理四个有趣的焦点,这些焦点可能会促进进一步的研究,或者可能会挑战作者的观点:(理性的)本质主义对超人类主义的归因,福祉的定义是超人类主义立场的基础,超人类主义的社会政治含义与其对激进个人自治的培养之间明显的紧张关系,对莱文以美国为中心的对亚里士多德美德伦理学方法的改编的批判性评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信