Handling of risk-bearing drugs during pregnancy. Do we choose less risky alternatives?

L T De Jong-Van den Berg, P B Van den Berg, F M Haaijer-Ruskamp, M N Dukes, H Wesseling
{"title":"Handling of risk-bearing drugs during pregnancy. Do we choose less risky alternatives?","authors":"L T De Jong-Van den Berg,&nbsp;P B Van den Berg,&nbsp;F M Haaijer-Ruskamp,&nbsp;M N Dukes,&nbsp;H Wesseling","doi":"10.1007/BF01980480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The drug use of nearly 2,000 pregnant women was evaluated at the level of the individual patient for the drugs belonging to the Australian risk categories B3, C and D. The pattern of changes in the use of these drugs is studied in terms of women who discontinue (d), continue (c) or begin (b) using the drug during pregnancy. The ratios d/(c+b) and d/b were the highest for the drugs belonging to the high-risk groups and the lowest for drugs from the low-risk categories. This suggests a congruence between theoretical knowledge and daily practice. Patients who had already been using a drug for a long time before pregnancy, more frequently continued using that drug than patients who had been using the drug only incidentally before. The described daily dose for the riskful drugs was approximately 20% lower in patients who started to use a drug during pregnancy compared to those who continued drug use. The data from this analysis indicate that the prescribing physician is generally aware of the possible risks of drug use during pregnancy. The d/(b+c) and d/b ratios are shown to be a good measure of prescribing behaviour in relation to pregnancy and can be used to compare knowledge of theory and daily practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19804,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutisch weekblad. Scientific edition","volume":"14 2","pages":"38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF01980480","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutisch weekblad. Scientific edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01980480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The drug use of nearly 2,000 pregnant women was evaluated at the level of the individual patient for the drugs belonging to the Australian risk categories B3, C and D. The pattern of changes in the use of these drugs is studied in terms of women who discontinue (d), continue (c) or begin (b) using the drug during pregnancy. The ratios d/(c+b) and d/b were the highest for the drugs belonging to the high-risk groups and the lowest for drugs from the low-risk categories. This suggests a congruence between theoretical knowledge and daily practice. Patients who had already been using a drug for a long time before pregnancy, more frequently continued using that drug than patients who had been using the drug only incidentally before. The described daily dose for the riskful drugs was approximately 20% lower in patients who started to use a drug during pregnancy compared to those who continued drug use. The data from this analysis indicate that the prescribing physician is generally aware of the possible risks of drug use during pregnancy. The d/(b+c) and d/b ratios are shown to be a good measure of prescribing behaviour in relation to pregnancy and can be used to compare knowledge of theory and daily practice.

孕期高危药物的处理。我们会选择风险较小的选择吗?
对近2000名孕妇的药物使用情况进行了个体患者级别的评估,评估了属于澳大利亚风险类别B3、C和d的药物的使用情况。研究了在怀孕期间停止(d)、继续(C)或开始(b)使用这些药物的妇女使用这些药物的变化模式。高危类药物的d/(c+b)和d/b比值最高,低危类药物的d/b比值最低。这表明理论知识和日常实践是一致的。那些在怀孕前已经长期服用药物的患者,比那些之前只是偶然服用过药物的患者更频繁地继续服用该药物。在怀孕期间开始使用药物的患者所描述的危险药物的日剂量比继续使用药物的患者低约20%。这一分析的数据表明,开处方的医生通常意识到怀孕期间使用药物的可能风险。d/(b+c)和d/b比率被证明是衡量与怀孕有关的处方行为的良好指标,可用于比较理论知识和日常实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信