Is Recormon less painful than Eprex after subcutaneous administration?

M W Hendriks, F P Peters, P M Hooymans, T W Van de Wiel, D Janknegt, R Janknegt, J J Lohman
{"title":"Is Recormon less painful than Eprex after subcutaneous administration?","authors":"M W Hendriks,&nbsp;F P Peters,&nbsp;P M Hooymans,&nbsp;T W Van de Wiel,&nbsp;D Janknegt,&nbsp;R Janknegt,&nbsp;J J Lohman","doi":"10.1007/BF01980483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we examined the differences in pain score after subcutaneous injection of the epoetin preparations Eprex and Recormon. Patients (n = 30) received 5 injections Eprex and 5 injections Recormon in a randomized double-blind sequence. 10 Min after receiving the injection the patient was asked to complete a visual and a verbal analogue scale and two descriptive scales. The results of 25 patients were used for statistical evaluation. The overall results indicate that there are significantly more patients reporting pain after subcutaneous injection of Eprex than after Recormon (11 versus 2 patients, p less than 0.05; McNemar test). 12 Patients reported no differences in pain. 43 Out of 123 injections Eprex and 69 out of 125 injections Recormon caused no pain (p less than 0.01; chi 2 9.455). For 4 patients Recormon was significantly (p less than 0.05) less painful than Eprex. It can be concluded that Recormon may be a less painful alternative for individual patients reporting pain after subcutaneous injection of Eprex.</p>","PeriodicalId":19804,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutisch weekblad. Scientific edition","volume":"14 2","pages":"55-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF01980483","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutisch weekblad. Scientific edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01980483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this study, we examined the differences in pain score after subcutaneous injection of the epoetin preparations Eprex and Recormon. Patients (n = 30) received 5 injections Eprex and 5 injections Recormon in a randomized double-blind sequence. 10 Min after receiving the injection the patient was asked to complete a visual and a verbal analogue scale and two descriptive scales. The results of 25 patients were used for statistical evaluation. The overall results indicate that there are significantly more patients reporting pain after subcutaneous injection of Eprex than after Recormon (11 versus 2 patients, p less than 0.05; McNemar test). 12 Patients reported no differences in pain. 43 Out of 123 injections Eprex and 69 out of 125 injections Recormon caused no pain (p less than 0.01; chi 2 9.455). For 4 patients Recormon was significantly (p less than 0.05) less painful than Eprex. It can be concluded that Recormon may be a less painful alternative for individual patients reporting pain after subcutaneous injection of Eprex.

雷蒙皮下给药后疼痛是否比依普雷克斯轻?
在这项研究中,我们研究了皮下注射促生成素制剂Eprex和rerecmon后疼痛评分的差异。患者(n = 30)在随机双盲序列中接受5次注射Eprex和5次注射recmon。注射后10分钟,患者被要求完成一份视觉和口头模拟量表以及两份描述性量表。对25例患者的结果进行统计评价。总体结果显示,皮下注射依普雷克斯后报告疼痛的患者明显多于雷莫门后(11例比2例,p < 0.05;McNemar检验法测试)。12例患者报告疼痛无差异。123例Eprex中43例无疼痛,125例rerecmon中69例无疼痛(p < 0.01;Chi 2 9.455)。4例患者的疼痛程度显著低于依普雷克斯(Eprex) (p < 0.05)。由此可以得出结论,对于报告皮下注射依普雷克斯后疼痛的个别患者,瑞蒙可能是一种疼痛较小的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信