Local Anesthetics Can Affect the Efficacy of Telomerase-Positive Stem Cells

H. Young, M. Speight
{"title":"Local Anesthetics Can Affect the Efficacy of Telomerase-Positive Stem Cells","authors":"H. Young, M. Speight","doi":"10.46889/jrmbr.2020.1102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early clinical studies with telomerase-positive stem cells demonstrated no response when these stem cells were mixed with lidocaine prior to clinical treatments in multiple individuals. Their stem cells demonstrated a positive response when mixed with normal sterile saline utilizing alternative routes of implantation. We hypothesized that lidocaine killed the stem cells before injection and that dead stem cells would give no response. We tested five local anesthetics, e.g., bupivacaine, lidocaine, marcaine, novocaine and procaine, with sterile saline in a series of blinded experiments to determine their ability to affect the viability of telomerase-positive stem cells. A mixture of TSCs, PSCs and MesoSCs were utilized from five individuals, three males and two females. Trypan blue was used to distinguish live versus dead PSCs and MesoSCs. The number of dead cells divided by total number of cells and multiplied by 100 was used for each test solution to determine their respective % kill ratio. Sample size was n=180 for each test solution. Lidocaine demonstrated a 100% kill ratio; novocaine and procaine demonstrated a 50% kill ratio and marcaine, bupivacaine and sterile saline demonstrated a 0% kill ratio. The","PeriodicalId":447063,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regenerative Medicine and Biology Research","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regenerative Medicine and Biology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46889/jrmbr.2020.1102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Early clinical studies with telomerase-positive stem cells demonstrated no response when these stem cells were mixed with lidocaine prior to clinical treatments in multiple individuals. Their stem cells demonstrated a positive response when mixed with normal sterile saline utilizing alternative routes of implantation. We hypothesized that lidocaine killed the stem cells before injection and that dead stem cells would give no response. We tested five local anesthetics, e.g., bupivacaine, lidocaine, marcaine, novocaine and procaine, with sterile saline in a series of blinded experiments to determine their ability to affect the viability of telomerase-positive stem cells. A mixture of TSCs, PSCs and MesoSCs were utilized from five individuals, three males and two females. Trypan blue was used to distinguish live versus dead PSCs and MesoSCs. The number of dead cells divided by total number of cells and multiplied by 100 was used for each test solution to determine their respective % kill ratio. Sample size was n=180 for each test solution. Lidocaine demonstrated a 100% kill ratio; novocaine and procaine demonstrated a 50% kill ratio and marcaine, bupivacaine and sterile saline demonstrated a 0% kill ratio. The
局部麻醉剂可影响端粒酶阳性干细胞的疗效
端粒酶阳性干细胞的早期临床研究表明,在临床治疗前将这些干细胞与利多卡因混合后,对多个个体没有反应。他们的干细胞表现出积极的反应,当与正常无菌生理盐水混合,利用其他途径植入。我们假设利多卡因在注射前杀死了干细胞,而死亡的干细胞不会产生反应。我们用无菌生理盐水对布比卡因、利多卡因、可卡因、奴佛卡因和普鲁卡因等5种局部麻醉剂进行了一系列盲法实验,以确定它们对端粒酶阳性干细胞生存能力的影响。从5个个体(3个雄性和2个雌性)中提取TSCs、PSCs和messcs。台盼蓝用于区分活的和死的PSCs和MesoSCs。用死亡细胞数除以总细胞数,再乘以100,测定各试验溶液的杀伤百分率。每个测试溶液的样本量为n=180。利多卡因显示出100%的杀伤率;奴佛卡因和普鲁卡因的杀伤率为50%,而可卡因、布比卡因和无菌生理盐水的杀伤率为0%。的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信