Comparison of Different LMP Calculations in Power Market Simulation

F. Li, R. Bo, Wenjuan Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of Different LMP Calculations in Power Market Simulation","authors":"F. Li, R. Bo, Wenjuan Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICPST.2006.321838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ongoing de-regulation of the U.S. electric power industry is to build open-access, non-discriminative and competitive electricity markets. In 2002 the federal energy regulatory commission (FERC) proposed Standard Market Design (SMD), in which the key is the locational marginal pricing (LMP) methodology to determine the energy price and to manage the network congestion. LMP has been adopted by or is under implementation at a number of ISO's such as PJM, NYISO, ISO-New England, etc. This paper presents an iterative DC optimal power flow (DCOPF) algorithm to calculate LMP. Iteration is needed in a linearized DC network because the loss factor is dependent on generation dispatch, while generation dispatch is affected by loss factor as well. The results from DCOPF are compared with ACOPF algorithm at different loading levels and transmission line resistances. It is interesting to observe that the LMP results from two models are close for most of the loading levels, but may be significantly different in a few scenarios when the error in the linearized DC model causes the change of marginal units. It is also interesting to observe the increasing trend of the difference between two models when line resistance grows.","PeriodicalId":181574,"journal":{"name":"2006 International Conference on Power System Technology","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 International Conference on Power System Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPST.2006.321838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The ongoing de-regulation of the U.S. electric power industry is to build open-access, non-discriminative and competitive electricity markets. In 2002 the federal energy regulatory commission (FERC) proposed Standard Market Design (SMD), in which the key is the locational marginal pricing (LMP) methodology to determine the energy price and to manage the network congestion. LMP has been adopted by or is under implementation at a number of ISO's such as PJM, NYISO, ISO-New England, etc. This paper presents an iterative DC optimal power flow (DCOPF) algorithm to calculate LMP. Iteration is needed in a linearized DC network because the loss factor is dependent on generation dispatch, while generation dispatch is affected by loss factor as well. The results from DCOPF are compared with ACOPF algorithm at different loading levels and transmission line resistances. It is interesting to observe that the LMP results from two models are close for most of the loading levels, but may be significantly different in a few scenarios when the error in the linearized DC model causes the change of marginal units. It is also interesting to observe the increasing trend of the difference between two models when line resistance grows.
电力市场模拟中不同LMP计算方法的比较
正在进行的对美国电力行业的放松管制是为了建立开放准入、非歧视和竞争的电力市场。2002年,联邦能源监管委员会(FERC)提出了标准市场设计(SMD),其中关键是确定能源价格和管理网络拥堵的位置边际定价(LMP)方法。LMP已被许多ISO采用或正在实施,如PJM、NYISO、ISO- new England等。本文提出了一种计算LMP的迭代直流最优潮流(DCOPF)算法。由于损耗因子依赖于发电调度,而发电调度又受损耗因子的影响,线性化直流网络需要进行迭代。将DCOPF算法与ACOPF算法在不同负载水平和传输线电阻下的结果进行了比较。有趣的是,两种模型的LMP结果在大多数负载水平下是接近的,但在线性化直流模型的误差导致边际单位变化的少数情况下可能会有显著差异。有趣的是,当线路阻力增大时,两个模型之间的差值也呈增大趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信