A radical phenomenology of the body: subjectivity and sensations in body image and body schema

H. Preester
{"title":"A radical phenomenology of the body: subjectivity and sensations in body image and body schema","authors":"H. Preester","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198851721.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of sensations for body experience and body representations such as body image and body schema seems indisputable. This chapter discusses the link between sensory input, the experience of one’s own body, and body representations such as body image and body schema. That happens on the basis of Michel Henry’s radical phenomenology of the body, which unites body and subjectivity and reconsiders the role of sensory input for the experience of the body and related representations. Without supporting, but inspired by, Henry’s ontological dualism between subjective and objective body, it is argued that the traditional view that considers sensory signals as all-important for bodily experience misses out a bodily dimension crucial for subjectivity—the body’s subjective dimension, not reigned by current sensory input. Cognitive science seems willing to accept representations that are over and above sensory input but still experiential in nature. The exact status of these ‘offline’ representations is, however, unclear. If it is true that these offline representations are responsible for crucial aspects of bodily subjective life (e.g., unity, ownership, presence), then it is unclear how these representations bring this experience about. Whereas online bodily representations are based on sensory input, offline bodily representations seem to be based on bodily experience over and above sensory life. In other words, they seem to represent or mediate what they are supposed to explain—the subjective body.","PeriodicalId":252697,"journal":{"name":"Body Schema and Body Image","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body Schema and Body Image","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851721.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of sensations for body experience and body representations such as body image and body schema seems indisputable. This chapter discusses the link between sensory input, the experience of one’s own body, and body representations such as body image and body schema. That happens on the basis of Michel Henry’s radical phenomenology of the body, which unites body and subjectivity and reconsiders the role of sensory input for the experience of the body and related representations. Without supporting, but inspired by, Henry’s ontological dualism between subjective and objective body, it is argued that the traditional view that considers sensory signals as all-important for bodily experience misses out a bodily dimension crucial for subjectivity—the body’s subjective dimension, not reigned by current sensory input. Cognitive science seems willing to accept representations that are over and above sensory input but still experiential in nature. The exact status of these ‘offline’ representations is, however, unclear. If it is true that these offline representations are responsible for crucial aspects of bodily subjective life (e.g., unity, ownership, presence), then it is unclear how these representations bring this experience about. Whereas online bodily representations are based on sensory input, offline bodily representations seem to be based on bodily experience over and above sensory life. In other words, they seem to represent or mediate what they are supposed to explain—the subjective body.
激进的身体现象学:身体意象与身体图式中的主体性与感觉
感觉在身体体验和身体表征(如身体形象和身体图式)中的作用似乎是无可争辩的。本章讨论了感官输入、对自己身体的体验和身体表征(如身体形象和身体图式)之间的联系。这是建立在米歇尔·亨利激进的身体现象学的基础上的,他把身体和主体性结合起来,重新考虑了感觉输入在身体体验和相关表征中的作用。亨利的主观和客观身体之间的本体论二元论虽然没有得到支持,但却受到了启发。有人认为,认为感觉信号对身体体验至关重要的传统观点忽略了一个对主体性至关重要的身体维度——身体的主观维度,不受当前感官输入的支配。认知科学似乎愿意接受超越感官输入但本质上仍然是经验的表征。然而,这些“离线”表述的确切状态尚不清楚。如果这些离线表征确实负责身体主观生活的关键方面(例如,统一性、所有权、存在),那么这些表征如何带来这种体验就不清楚了。在线的身体表征是基于感官输入的,而离线的身体表征似乎是基于超越感官生活的身体体验。换句话说,它们似乎代表或调解了它们应该解释的东西——主观身体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信